Tag: Hector Berlioz

  • Botstein, Dodging Bullets, Conducts Berlioz Edition of Weber’s “Der Freischütz”

    Botstein, Dodging Bullets, Conducts Berlioz Edition of Weber’s “Der Freischütz”

    One of the times I saw John Williams in concert, he conducted some selections from his then recently-composed score to the Disney “Star Wars” revival, “The Force Awakens.” In between numbers, he remarked to the audience that he would continue to write music for the next installment, “The Last Jedi.” When the applause subsided, he followed it up with a quip, something along the lines of he really didn’t want to do it; but he really didn’t want anybody ELSE to do it either.

    I remembered that on Thursday night when I was at Carnegie Hall to hear a concert performance of Hector Berlioz’s edition of Carl Maria von Weber’s “Der Freischütz.”


    Weber’s magnum opus, which took Europe by storm following its premiere in 1821, ignited a bold, new, Romantic era of lurid sensation in the opera house. German opera, in particular, would never be the same. The scenario and music reveled in an idealized past of roistering huntsmen and folk-like melodies, but also pushed into the darker territories of dread, emotional turmoil, and pacts with the Devil. The work traveled well, to New York, Rio de Janeiro, Cape Town, Sydney – everywhere it seems except Paris.

    Despite its near-universal appeal, “Freischütz” was dismissed by effete Parisians as being unsuited to their traditions. The Paris Opera forbade spoken dialogue, and the audience would have been scandalized had there not been a ballet in one of the later acts (a traditional diversion for aristocratic gentlemen who preferred to linger over supper, before settling into their boxes to ogle their mistresses among the dancers). As late as 1861, there were shouts of disdain when Wagner gave a big eff you to the French by placing his ballet at the beginning of “Tannhäuser.” When the second performance was disrupted by literal dog whistles, Wagner cancelled the rest of the run. If “Freischütz” were ever going to play Paris, it would require a major touch-up. And the Opera planned to do just that.

    Actually, it had been attempted once before at a rival house, the Théâtre de l’Odéon, in 1824, when Henri Castil-Blaze exercised a heavy hand in editing Weber’s original, cutting, reordering material, and even adapting vocal lines for a production retitled “Robin des Bois” – the French name for “Robin Hood,” even though the opera has nothing at all to do with the English folk hero.

    Berlioz was wild for “Freischütz,” to the extent that he lauded it in his memoirs and elsewhere as among his favorite operas. Unsurprisingly, he came to regard the Castil-Blaze version as an “insulting travesty, hacked and mutilated,” although enough of Weber’s magic remained, apparently, that he was compelled to attend several performances. Previously his operatic paragons had been the high-minded works of Christoph Willibald Gluck and Gaspare Spontini. Weber’s fantastic drama would have a profound influence on Berlioz’s subsequent development.

    Berlioz in 1845

    When Berlioz was approached by the Paris Opera to create his own edition of “Freischütz” (as “Le Freyschutz”) in 1841, he was not enthusiastic. Like Williams, who really didn’t want to do the next “Star Wars” movie, he feared what somebody else – somebody with less talent, less refinement, and less investment in the source material – might do with it. So Berlioz determined to commit to the project and worked hard to honor Weber’s legacy and actually make it good. And quite frankly, his version of the opera comes off better than anyone could ever hope.

    The title always sounds awkward in English. It’s often translated as “The Free-Shooter.” And the construction of the piece is about as clunky as the title would have you to expect. The work is not through-sung in the manner of a traditional opera, but rather it is a singspiel – you know, like Mozart’s “The Magic Flute” – with the arias, ensembles, and choruses linked by spoken dialogue. This has often posed a problem in recordings, as often it requires a major suspension of disbelief on a listener’s part to accept the actors who are assigned the spoken parts as analogous to the characters portrayed by singers of the roles. Also, for anyone who is not fluent in German, the spoken passages can very quickly wear out their welcome.

    So perhaps it is unsurprising – although it was a delightful surprise to me – that I actually found myself enjoying Berlioz’s edition more than Weber’s original. From a musical standpoint, it just goes down a whole lot easier, since Berlioz takes all those tiresome spoken lines and lends them musical interest by tastefully scoring them as recitative. “Der Freischütz” gains, therefore, from an unbroken musical flow. This might be considered blasphemous in some circles – no doubt German speakers will find more sustained interest in Weber’s original design – and for sure, there is a kind of bizarre alchemy that takes place if you allow yourself to think about the hybrid analytically. The sung French subtly changes the character of piece. The sound of the vocal lines is softened, and the text flows more mellifluously than it does when spiked with the harder, more intrusive consonants of German. And without drawing attention from Weber’s arias, Berlioz sustains and even enhances the atmosphere and dramatic momentum through his subtle artistry.

    In terms of the performance itself, listening to the execution of the overture on Thursday, I was reminded of Sir Thomas Beecham’s “two golden rules for an orchestra: start together and finish together. The public doesn’t give a damn what goes on in between.” It would have helped had the musicians been able to play with more commitment and intensity, to get the evening off to a good start. The horn passages were not particularly impressive, which was worrisome for an opera with plenty of exposed horn-playing, since after all it is brimming with huntsmen.

    Happily, whatever sense of foreboding instilled by the playing in the overture was dispelled immediately, as the horns were on point for the rest of the night. Furthermore, the performance ended strongly, with Leon Botstein and his musicians, especially the always superb Bard Festival Chorale (prepared by James Bagwell), tapped unsuspected reserves for the work’s Mozartian finale, which played like Sarastro’s grandest apotheosis ever. I didn’t see anything like it coming. So yes, it sent me out of the hall feeling uplifted and happy.

    The team of vocal soloists assembled for the evening included some familiar faces, from both American Symphony Orchestra and Bard Festival concerts. (Botstein directs both.) While I had my personal preferences, in terms of timbre, intensity, and projection, each had their individual strengths. The singers were mostly well-matched, but I found tenor Freddie Ballentine, in the lead role of Max, at his strongest in moments like his Act II trio, in which he blended sensitively his female costars.

    On a purely charismatic level, soprano Cadie Bryan – who sang Milada in last year’s production of Smetana’s “Dalibor” at Bard and here filled the supporting role of Annette – upstaged soprano Nicole Chevalier as her anguished cousin Agathe, whose character, let’s face it, is a real Debbie Downer. This despite the fact that Chevalier sang her arias beautifully.

    I’ve seen bass-baritone Alfred Walker a number of times, and he’s always very good – he had a meaty role as Saint-Saëns’ Henri VIII at Bard and also sang the King in “Dalibor” – but here, as Max’s duplicitous rival, he’s given less to do, especially since the opera in this performance was not staged. Essentially, the singers stood, sang, and emoted at their music stands.

    Naturally, where any concert performance of “Freischütz” suffers the most is in the celebrated Wolf’s Glen sequence, with its creepy midnight rendezvous to barter souls for magic bullets. There should be specters, thunder and lightning, owls roosting in withered tress, and an all-important human skull. Thursday night’s audience pieced out these imperfections with their thoughts, while one of the choristers (unidentified in the program, alas) offered diabolical interjections from the balcony as Satanic Samiel, the Black Huntsman.


    Among the supporting singers, baritone Adam Partridge as Kilian, a good-natured peasant who outshoots Max in the contest of the opera’s first act, had a great voice and a commanding presence, and bass Philip Cokorinos, a familiar presence, here as Kuono, head gamekeeper and Agathe’s father, sang his part with satisfying resonance.

    The whole plot hinges on Max winning a shooting contest so that he can attain job security (as worthy successor to Kuono) and Agathe’s hand in marriage. His poor luck at the start leaves him open to the temptations of Gaspar, who himself has sold his soul to Samiel, the Dark Huntsman, for some magic bullets. Gaspar hopes to delay his hour of reckoning by luring Max to damnation and Agathe along with him.

    While bass-baritone Jason Zacher, who towered physically over the rest of the cast as the Hermit, really didn’t have all that much to do – he only really gets to sing at the end – this deus ex machina character always amuses me in his earnestness. What I would pay to hear him break character and cry, “Wait! I was going to make espresso!”

    For the ballet music, Berlioz orchestrated Weber’s piano piece “Invitation to the Dance” – which, in its new guise, became a breakout hit, even if, technically, it seems as out-of-place as the Viennese waltz interlude Erich Wolfgang Korngold employs during the rustic banquet in “The Adventures of Robin Hood.” A universal truth: for as long as Berlioz’s arrangement has been around, and for as frequently as it’s been played, people still applaud before the quiet cello denouement.

    The opera’s performance, taken as a whole, was a satisfying one, and as always, Botstein and his players should be proud to have shared yet another unusual, not insignificant, indeed revelatory work with such a large audience. (The concert was well attended.)


    As is often the case, Botstein, who has been music director of the American Symphony Orchestra for 34 years, delivered a pre-concert talk an hour before the performance. As president of Bard College for over half a century, he has long been a master in the art of public speaking. He imparts his information articulately and with impressive fluency, and an off-handedness that belies the care and lucidity of his thought. Key to his success as a communicator, I think, is that he always somehow manages to keep the intellectual balancing act both conversational and engaging. He also has a wry sense of humor, and he’s not afraid to use it.

    When he returned to the stage for the performance itself, the audience received him warmly. There were no boos or catcalls or demonstrations – no indication at all of the emotional turbulence that has roiled Bard campus since his name has been linked with that of Jeffrey Epstein.

    In a nutshell, Botstein, as college president and its most prominent fundraiser, did everything he could to court Epstein, after the latter’s unsolicited donation of $75,000 to the institution. Although Botstein himself has not been accused of any criminal activity, his allegedly having turned a blind eye to Epstein’s six-years-earlier conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor has blown up at Bard since the release of the Epstein files, with outraged activists calling for him to step down. Botstein, who is pushing 80, but remains in good physical and mental health, has talked about retirement, with the possibility of him staying on to teach and conduct Bard’s graduate ensemble, The Orchestra Now. An independent investigation is ongoing.

    Botstein is scheduled to conduct a staged production of Richard Strauss’ “Die ägyptische Helena,” or “The Egyptian Helen,” at the school’s annual arts festival, Bard SummerScape, July 24-August 2. Presumably, he will then return to preside over this year’s Bard Music Festival, “Mozart and His World,” August 7-16, although the marketing so far has been very quiet regarding his hopeful participation.

    Botstein, of course, makes a specialty of resurrecting unusual and neglected repertoire. Mozart is unusually down-the-middle for him, but Bard is celebrated for its curve balls. We’ll see what they do with it.

    Incredibly, Thursday was the first time the Berlioz edition of “Der Freischütz” had ever been presented in the United States. There were no projected supertitles during the performance. Rather, the America Symphony Orchestra did it the old-fashioned way, with the complete French-English libretto included as an insert in the program booklet. I found it surprising, although it is certainly an incentive for me to hang onto mine. (It tickles me to see Wolf’s Glen, the haunted ravine where all the supernatural business goes down, translated as Gorge du Loup.) I am astonished to find there has been only one recording of the Berlioz edition. From what I gather, it is worth having for the curiosity value, even if the performance itself isn’t on a level with any of the primary recommendations of the standard German version.

    For as welcome a discovery as it was – and I would attend a performance of it again in a heartbeat – the sung dialogue and added ballet music made for a long evening, with three acts of roughly 50 minutes each and one intermission. With stopped traffic at the Lincoln Tunnel, I finally decided to take a chance and zip down to the Holland Tunnel, which turned out to be a big mistake. Even though by then it was after midnight, I don’t know how many lanes were funneling in from how many different directions, but once inside the tunnel there was construction, and everything was down to a single lane. It was nearly 2:00 by the time I arrived home in Princeton. More than once, my glacial escape from New York made me wish for one of Samiel’s magic bullets.

    But I will always have the memory of the night’s performance, capped by that rousing ending, with singers and instrumentalists joined in a grand finale that would have done Sir Thomas Beecham proud. It’s the kind of experience that makes attending a live musical event, under whatever circumstances, worthwhile.

    Weber in 1825

    ——-

    “The Egyptian Helen” at Bard SummerScape, July 24-August 2

    https://fishercenter.bard.edu/series/the-egyptian-helen/

    “Mozart and His World” at the Bard Music Festival, August 7-16

    https://fishercenter.bard.edu/what…/bard-music-festival/

  • Brickbats and Adulation for Berlioz

    Brickbats and Adulation for Berlioz

    It’s a major birthday today for those of us who admire the seething Romantics.

    I’ve written a lot about Hector Berlioz over the years (feel free to search at rossamico.com), but because of the day’s obligations and the mounting pressure of the holidays, I thought I could get away with sharing a few caricatures.

    After all, Berlioz had one of the great heads of hair in all of classical music, and his compositions have invited parody by cartoonists who fill with their pages with exploding cannon, roaring choruses, and ruptured eardrums. No one can say Berlioz didn’t earn it, although he could exercise touching restraint, on occasion, as in his chansons, his song cycle “Les Nuits d’été,” and his Christmas oratorio “L’Enfance du Christ.”

    Yeah, he could be a little crazy at times, like when he wouldn’t take no for an answer when attempting to woo the Shakespearean actress Harriet Smithson, to the point that he composed an epic, programmatic symphony, evocative of an opium-induced fever dream, her murder (!), his execution, and a witches’ sabbat, hoping to impress her. (He did.)

    Or the time he raced back to France from Italy in a coach with two loaded pistols, a vial of poison, and women’s clothes, planning a cross-dressing murder of his inconstant fiancée and her lover. (He abandoned the plot after he forgot the dress when changing coaches.)

    But he could also be incisive in his observations and exhibited a wry sense of humor in his writings.

    The website at the link below is full of amusing Berlioziana, and in fact it was in doing an image search for caricatures that I discovered it. The administrators are a husband-and-wife team of retired Scottish academics who are passionate about the composer. The site is the result of nearly 30 years’ effort. A lot of the images were scanned from their own personal collection, so if I’m going to violate their claim of copyright by borrowing a couple to illustrate this piece, I might as well give them some free publicity and direct you to the site, which is quite staggering as a resource for information about the composer. It betrays an obsessive quality worthy of the great Berlioz himself!

    Thank you, Michel Austin and Monir Tayeb*, for all your hard work and generosity. And happy birthday, Hector Berlioz!

    http://www.hberlioz.com

    ——-

    *In looking more deeply into the website, I learn that Monir Tayeb passed away in 2021. My condolences to her widower, Michel Austin. I certainly mean no disrespect with my whimsical tone. I am sincerely awed by their accomplishment!

    ——-

    IMAGES: From “The Hector Berlioz Website,” cartoons published in “Le Figaro,” March 3, 1883: “H. Berlioz – Before” and “H. Berlioz – Today”

  • Berlioz’s L’enfance du Christ Explained

    Berlioz’s L’enfance du Christ Explained

    I read a lot of Berlioz over the past year. (He was the composer of focus at last summer’s Bard Music Festival.) If his Memoirs make one thing clear, it’s that people, with all their foibles and bureaucracies, are always the same. And when it comes to Berlioz’s music, haters gonna hate.

    Granted, Berlioz’s music is like nobody else’s, so forward-looking at times that it still makes listeners accustomed to the more rational works of his predecessors (Beethoven was still viewed askance in some circles) and milder contemporaries (Mendelssohn was a friend) uneasy. He never mastered the finer points of theory, they grumble. He makes too much noise. He’s just plain weird. Well, yeah, maybe. But those things are also what make him great.

    Of his large-scale compositions, perhaps there is no greater retort to the Berlioz agnostic than “L’enfance du Christ” (“The Childhood of Christ”). The work is rare in Berlioz’s canon in that it wasn’t uniformly lambasted by the Parisian critics when it was given its debut in 1853. In fact, his detractors lauded this kinder, gentler style, and identified it as a welcome shift in Berlioz’s development; which Berlioz, of course, declared to be nonsense. The style merely suited the subject, he said, and had he written “L’enfance” twenty years earlier, he would have approached it in precisely the same manner.

    The work came to him easily, if in somewhat of a piecemeal fashion. Berlioz rolled it out gradually, with one of the best-known numbers, “The Shepherds’ Farewell,” originally conceived as an organ piece for a friend. This he soon transformed into a choral setting, which he impishly introduced under the assumed name of a fictitious 17th century composer, Ducré. The audience at the first performance was enchanted. At least one old woman was heard to remark, “Berlioz would never be able to write a tune as simple and charming as this little piece by old Ducré.”

    Next to be composed was the tenor aria, “Le repos de la sainte famille” (“The Repose of the Holy Family”). This and “The Shepherd’s Farewell” are two of the most striking movements of the entire work. It’s easy for “Le repos,” especially, to get stuck in one’s head. Then again, my head is full of flypaper for this sort of thing.

    Berlioz added an overture and called it “La fuite en Egypte” (“The Flight into Egypt”). The premiere was so successful that he was encouraged to create a companion piece, “L’arrivée à Sais” (“The Arrival at Sais”), which included parts for Mary and Joseph. “Le songe d’Hérode” (“Herod’s Dream”), the first panel of the completed triptych, was the last to be composed.

    Though Berlioz himself was not religious, he had a lifelong appreciation for the beauty of religious music (as long as it didn’t conclude with a fugue, a fashion he found ludicrously academic and generally out of keeping with the subject at hand).

    This composer, who achieved notoriety for his lurid evocations of witches’ sabbaths, brigands’ orgies, and headlong galops into the abyss of Hell, described “L’enfance du Christ” as a “sacred trilogy.” It is perhaps the least outlandish of his major works. It has maintained its popularity and is still performed around Christmas. Not too long ago, you might even encounter it on American classical radio. In 2024, I wish you luck with that. At the risk of mixing my biblical references, the struggle against Philistinism never ends.

    Happy birthday, Hector Berlioz!


    “The Shepherds’ Farewell”

    “Le repos de la sainte famille”

  • Bard’s Berlioz & His World: A Deep Dive

    Bard’s Berlioz & His World: A Deep Dive

    When the Bard Music Festival calls itself “[insert composer’s name here] and His World,” it does so with the aim of providing a diverse, expansive, and at times even exhausting exploration of the subject’s contemporaries, his influences, those he influenced, and his wider legacy. And by suggesting that it can wear you out, I am in no way implying that I don’t love it. If Bard can bring it, I can take it, and with gratitude.

    As you undoubtedly know by now, if you’ve been following my posts, this year’s focus is Berlioz. However, even with such a heavy helping of Hector as on the concert presented on Saturday night, featuring not only the composer’s titanic “Te Deum,” but also selections from his grand opera “Les Troyens” (“The Trojans”) and a mammoth setting of “La Marseillaise” that REALLY would have flabbergasted Major Strasser, there was also the inclusion of Gluck’s overture to “Iphigénie en Aulide” (Gluck, a composer who influenced Berlioz), in an arrangement by Wagner (a composer Berlioz in turn influenced) – ingenious programming, actually, but hardly surprising – AND the overture to Auber’s “Fra Diavolo” (Auber, a figure who undoubtedly influenced Berlioz, but about whom Berlioz could be rather ambivalent, feeling he pandered a little too much to what he perceived as shallow Parisian tastes).

    And you know what? For as popular as Auber’s overtures remain – for decades, staples of afternoon drive time on any classical music radio station – this may actually have been the first time I ever actually heard one in concert. How can that possibly be? Any one of them would make for a sparkling opener to an enjoyable evening of music-making. (Sorry, Berlioz!) As it is, he is yet another composer whose music I encountered live for the first time at Bard.

    So often with Berlioz, who at the far end of his large-scale works can be such a frankly draining composer, I am convinced he willed himself to greatness. What a genius he must have been to take the rudimentary tools he had at his disposal and create such monuments in sound. Unquestionably, he knew his way around an orchestra. And he was well-drilled by his teachers at the Paris Conservatory. Yet he was perhaps not so naturally inclined to the minute workings-out of formal musical procedures in the manner of a Haydn or a Mozart. If so, he was all the better for it, as there is only one Hector Berlioz. No one thought in orchestral terms quite like him. But at the other end of the scale, he was also a born composer of song.

    Earlier in the day, a Saturday morning panel discussion examined different aspects of the composer and his world through engaging and often fascinating talks and exchanges about revolution, the historical evolution of Paris in the 19th century, and even how Berlioz was received and interpreted by the droll caricaturists of his time.

    As is so often the case with Bard, the most shattering moments may have come during in the evening concerts, when the full forces of symphony orchestra and chorus were massed at the Fisher Center for the Performing Arts; but most of the quieter, more revelatory moments occurred in the more intimate space of Bard’s Olin Hall, at which song and chamber music prevailed.

    At the Fisher Center, Joshua Blue’s pleasing tenor voice lent considerably to the opening night rehabilitation of Berlioz’s “Lélio” (at least in terms of the work’s musical content). He returned on Saturday night not only as soloist in the “Te Deum,” but to share a love duet from “Les Troyens” with mezzo-soprano Megan Moore. He might have been the weekend’s greatest vocal discovery, if not for soprano Jana McIntyre. (Even so, those attending Bard this Sunday will have no complaints, as Blue will sing Berlioz’s Faust!)

    McIntyre, with her captivating voice, magnetic presence, and superhuman endurance, appeared frequently throughout the weekend and emerged as the most enchanting performer at Olin. Always radiant and communicative, she was in her element in French art song during her frequent afternoon appearances on the chamber concerts. But on Saturday night, she also demonstrated her ability to command a concert hall, even in Berlioz’s gargantuan arrangement of “La Marseillaise,” with its massed brass, winds, percussion, and chorus. She stood her ground – “the very embodiment of liberty,” as a fellow concertgoer memorably put it – dominating center stage in a brilliant red gown with her chin held high. Yes, coupled with the “Te Deum” AND selections from “Les Troyens,” AND the aforementioned overtures, by Gluck (arr. Wagner) and Auber, it proved to be a high-caloric evening!

    I can’t believe she had any voice at all left over for Sunday morning, yet there she was at 11 a.m., participating extensively in Byron Adams’ matinée musicale, where she continued to shine and, quite frankly, glow. What a talent! She easily stood out as the star of the festival’s first weekend, and she receives a respectful tip of the hat from Classic Ross Amico.

    As for the music itself, discoveries I will carry with me include the “Introduction and Variations on Bellini’s Opera ‘Norma’” by Elias Parish Alvars (known in his day as “the Liszt of the harp”), mesmerizingly played by Noël Wan, a String Quartet in C minor by Anton Reicha (who taught Berlioz counterpoint at the Paris Conservatory, previously known to me mostly from his woodwind music), affectionately performed by the Balourdet Quartet, and a languid, intoxicating song, “Adieux de l’hôtesse arabe,” by Georges Bizet (of “Carmen” fame), again sung by McIntyre, as part of Byron Adams’ exquisitely-curated program of French chansons, romances et mélodies on Sunday.

    Baritone Tyler Duncan, a Bard veteran, as always was a singer of commanding presence, but also expert at conveying the wry tone of a song like Saint-Saëns’ witty throwback to the manners of the ancien regime, “Marquise, vous souvenez-vous?” Also returning was mezzo-soprano Rebecca Ringle Kamarei. For as fine as she was in the afternoons, she was outstanding on Sunday evening in a virtuosic performance of an aria by Rossini from “L’italiana in Algeri.”

    I would be remiss not to credit the contributions of pianists Kayo Iwama and Erika Switzer, both with their own distinctive musical personalities, who not only accompanied but were sensitive collaborators with the aforementioned singers.

    I want to treat Sunday night’s treasurable presentation of Pauline Viardot’s fairy tale opera “Le dernier sorcier” (“The Last Sorcerer”), which concluded the opening weekend, in a separate post. So watch for it!

    The Bard Music Festival resumes today with a supplementary, already sold-out concert at Church of the Messiah in Rhinebeck, NY (with a second concert to be held there tomorrow afternoon), but Weekend Two really commences in earnest with a concert tomorrow night at the Fisher Center on Bard campus, featuring violist Luosha Fang and pianist Piers Lane in Franz Liszt’s transcription of Berlioz’s “Harold in Italy.” The program on Saturday night will include Louise Farrenc’s Symphony No. 3 and Joachim Raff’s Symphony No. 10 “Autumn.” Sunday will conclude with a complete performance of Berlioz’s “The Damnation of Faust.”

    “Berlioz and His World” continues, largely at Bard College in Annandale-on-Hudson, NY, through Sunday, August 18. For more information, visit https://fishercenter.bard.edu/whats-on/programs/bard-music-festival/

    Fisher Center at Bard

    Jana McIntyre sings Aminta in Richard Strauss’ rarely-heard “Die schweigsame Frau” (“The Silent Woman”) at Bard in 2022, at the link:

  • Berlioz’s Crazy Genius at Bard Festival

    Berlioz’s Crazy Genius at Bard Festival

    Hector Berlioz was not the kind of guy to always go about things the way you might expect. For instance, if you wanted to impress a prospective lover, would you think it would be in your best interest to write a programmatic symphony, in which your obsession with her drives you to overdose on opium? Then, under its influence, to dream about murdering her, so that you’re condemned to execution by the guillotine? Then to vividly illustrate being tormented in the Hereafter by her spirit, now transformed into a jeering, cackling witch?

    Well, Berlioz, arch-Romantic that he was, was a guy who followed his gut. And what do you know, it worked! The Shakespearean actress Harriet Smithson, who inspired the piece (even though Berlioz didn’t speak English and she couldn’t speak French), said “I do.” Some chicks dig the crazy.

    Not that they lived happily ever after. I know, who could have predicted it?

    Anyway, this is the backdrop to Berlioz’s “Symphonie fantastique,” his most famous work, and it kicked off the Bard Music Festival, “Berlioz and His World,” at Bard College’s Fisher Center for the Performing Arts on Friday night. Leon Botstein, founder and co-artistic director of the festival (and president of Bard College), conducted The Orchestra NOW (TON for short), Bard’s graduate-level training orchestra.

    As is so often the case, if you own a recording of the piece, for as transporting as it might be, it just isn’t the same as hearing it live. Reencountering Berlioz’s forward-looking symphony (which must have caused heads to explode in 1830) blew my hair back, or what’s left of it, again and again. It’s hard to believe I once had a coif every bit as impudent as the composer’s. Why, it seems like only yesterday…

    But I digress.

    With its faltering chromatic harmony, beefed-up orchestra (for the period), Beethovenian length, and outlandish instrumental effects, it pushed the envelope decades into the future. Wagner (among others) glommed onto Berlioz, but the composer’s legacy truly flourished with the generation of Gustav Mahler, nearly 70 years later. That’s an entire lifetime. His concept of the “idée fixe,” a recurring motif that intrudes on the flow of every movement, signifying unbidden remembrances of the composer’s beloved, was also influential.

    On to the performance at hand: I may have heard wilder ones, but none quite so visceral. With the strings at stage level, the rowdier instruments were positioned on risers, and the bass drums in particular were like volcanoes that exploded into the audience. The chimes that herald the “Dies Irae,” a presentiment of the doom if ever there was one, were immediate and chilling. It was great fun to watch the strings put through their diabolical repertoire of col legno, con sordino, pizzicato, tremolo, and double stopping, and the ensemble was able to bring the energy to put the piece over the top and bring a sense of abandon at its peak moments.

    Also notable was the inclusion of the obbligato cornet in the second movement, the one in which composer’s pangs of longing contrast with the spirited whirl of festivity at a ball, a touch seldom employed. Apparently Berlioz added the cornet (perhaps for the virtuoso Jean-Baptiste Arban), but it never made it into the published score in the composer’s lifetime. I love you, Berlioz, but in this instance I think your original conception was best. For me, the cornet brings unfortunate associations with the gazebo or the boardwalk, and also obscures the elegance of this waltz through the composer’s haunted mansion – but it was ear-opening to hear the alternative version for once at Bard. Part of the festival’s mission, after all, is to be a platform for scholarly inquiry and display. If the movement were going to be done this way, this was definitely the context in which to do it. (I believe the cornet soloist was Jid-anan Netthai, but this I will have to confirm.)

    I confess, I had my reservations about starting the festival with such a substantial and well-known piece. When the program was first announced, I was puzzled as to why Bard, known for its exploration of unusual and the neglected repertoire, would open its festival with Berlioz’s greatest hit. But in the event, it certainly paid off and got blood pumping. I also realized after a moment’s reflection, its inclusion provided the necessary context for the full appreciation of the seldom-encountered “Lelio,” which was heard on the second half of the concert.

    A sequel of sorts to the “Symphonie fantastique,” “Lelio, or the Return to Life” comes across as a much more self-indulgent affair, if only because of the extensive dramatic commentary allotted to the narrator. Again, this is a heavily autobiographical piece. Unfortunately, if you take away all the lofty references to art and Shakespeare, it’s basically the whiny “reflections” of a lovelorn 20-something.

    The Bard presentation made it even more so. I have nothing against Babe Howard (the son of Debra Winger), who was presumably a late substitute for the scheduled narrator, Wyatt Mason, and I wish him all the best with his career. But here he came across as sorely miscast and underprepared, to the extent of not perhaps fully understanding the character of the figure he was meant to portray. I can think of no lower compliment than to say that I could have done it just as well myself. (I too spent much of my twenties as lofty, whiny, and lovelorn.) For me, it was just too much of a stretch to accept him as the convincing alter ego of a seething, half-mad artist, emerging from an opium-induced nightmare to grasp his breaking heart. About the only thing he played convincingly was young. Also, he didn’t impress me much as an actor accustomed to appearing on the stage. That’s not to say the technique will not come, but I imagine he would be much more at home in something more contemporary.

    That aside, the music was fascinating, and very well performed. Having previously known “Lelio” only from recordings – especially Jean Martinon’s, in which the narrator delivers his part in French – it was as if the scales had fallen from my eyes. THIS is what Bard is all about! I’ve aired the concluding “Fantasy on Shakespeare’s ‘The Tempest’” on my radio shows many times, but I had no idea the entire score was so varied and beautiful, with the quality of the music quite high. That said, it’s impossible that it will ever secure a place in the public’s affection equal to that enjoyed by the “Symphonie fantastique,” especially as presented here, as the composer originally intended, emulating the salon format, so popular in that era, but also in the guise of a melodrama, a largely-defunct genre in which narration and music are combined to form a cohesive dramatic statement.

    As always, the Bard Festival Chorus and vocal soloists were first-rate, with bass-baritone Alfred Walker delivering a lusty “Brigands’ Song” and tenor Joshua Blue (who returned on Saturday night to solo in Berlioz’s “Te Deum”) lending further allure to “The Fisherman Ballad” and the “Song of Happiness.” The cumulative effect was one of magnification of the impressive range of Berlioz’s genius, which ranges well beyond the heaven-storming orchestral works that are so well known, especially as a composer for voice.

    I pause to wonder: whatever happened to the brigand, anyway? It’s a career that seems to have gone the way of the melodrama.

    All in all, a rewarding, often captivating, and at times even thrilling evening, and presented in a manner that Bard has perfected over the past 33 seasons. Bravo, and more, please!

    The Bard Music Festival continues through August 18. For more information, follow the link.

    https://fishercenter.bard.edu/whats-on/programs/bard-music-festival/

    Fisher Center at Bard

Tag Cloud

Aaron Copland (93) Beethoven (95) Composer (114) Film Music (126) Film Score (143) Film Scores (255) Halloween (94) John Williams (189) KWAX (229) Leonard Bernstein (101) Marlboro Music Festival (125) Movie Music (141) Mozart (87) Opera (203) Philadelphia Orchestra (89) Picture Perfect (174) Princeton Symphony Orchestra (107) Radio (87) Ross Amico (244) Roy's Tie-Dye Sci-Fi Corner (290) The Classical Network (101) The Lost Chord (268) Vaughan Williams (103) WPRB (396) WWFM (881)

DON’T MISS A BEAT

Receive a weekly digest every Sunday at noon by signing up here


RECENT POSTS