Category: Concert Reviews

  • Opera Weekend:   “Andrea Chénier” at OperaDelaware; “Frida y Diego” at the Met

    Opera Weekend: “Andrea Chénier” at OperaDelaware; “Frida y Diego” at the Met

    Since I was taken ill a few weeks ago, when I was hoping to get in to the Metropolitan Opera for a Saturday matinee of “Eugene Onegin,” my ticket was exchanged for a new opera by Gabriela Lena Frank, longtime composer-in-residence with the Philadelphia Orchestra, whose stock has since skyrocketed, as she was recently awarded this year’s Pulitzer Prize for Music. I had intended to catch “El último sueño de Frida y Diego” anyway, at the movies, as part of the Met Live in HD series (on May 30 or June 3). That said, how lucky I was to actually experience it in the house!

    The opera, a postscript to the tempestuous real-life love story of Mexican artists Frida Kahlo and Diego Rivera, is ingeniously set during El Día del Los Muertos – the Day of the Dead. Kahlo’s spirit returns in a kind of reverse Orpheus and Eurydice story to guide Rivera to the afterlife. A great many operas can be summed up in a line or two, but any such synopsis cannot do justice to the Met’s production design (by Jon Bausor) and choreography (by director Deborah Colker). Predictably, some of Kahlo’s most iconic paintings are recreated, and Diego perches on a scaffold before one of his murals in its early stages, but the eyepopping supernatural element brings a whole other element of interest.

    As with this season’s immigrant experience/proto-superhero comic book “The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier & Clay,” another Met debut, I was set to wondering how well the work succeeds as an opera, as opposed to a functional score elevated by all the superlative stagecraft. As I remarked about “Kavalier & Clay,” I’m not sure if the music in itself fits the bill, but I am unshakeable in my conviction that it’s one hell of a show. Frankly, comparing the two is kind of like comparing a corned beef sandwich and a tamale. Anyway, even a fabulous score can misalign on the opera stage, where words and music, conflict and emotion need to strike a perfect balance. There are plenty of great composers who have been unable to stick the landing.

    My impression of “Frida y Diego,” on first hearing, is that the music is on an entirely different level than Mason Bates’ for “Kavalier & Clay,” perhaps less overtly melodic (“K&C” was almost like a movie in sound and execution), yet ultimately having greater resonance. The piece is marvelously orchestrated (although I can’t say I could really make out some of the more novel touches, such as when one of the percussionists ran bows along the keys of a marimba). But not all operas are driven by melody. It’s not that “Frida y Diego” is not “melodic” (it’s definitely tonal), it just doesn’t really have any big tunes. So don’t go into it expecting to luxuriate in bel canto.

    That’s not to say it doesn’t have arias and even some showstopping moments. Mezzo-soprano Isabel Leonard, as always, is excellent as Frida – and my, did the make-up people transform her into the spitting image of Kahlo – even when she was called upon to lie down or execute certain pieces of choreography.


    However, soprano Gabriella Reyes brought it big time as Catrina, Keeper of the Dead, transcending, rather than being swallowed up by, her incredible skull-and-bones costume. She positively owned the role.

    It says something for countertenor Nils Wanderer that up against such a powerhouse that he would make such a strong impression as Leonardo, a Greta Garbo impersonator(!) dressed as Queen Christina. It’s hard to explain this element, but just go with it. It’s oddly moving, and it works. Also, watch “Queen Christina.” It’s a great movie.

    It was good to see baritone Carlos Álvarez back on the Met stage, but especially in the scene where he’s standing on the scaffold, the acoustic did his voice no favors. It’s not that he sounded bad – he did not – it’s just that he didn’t carry as well as did his higher-voiced colleagues. With six levels and close to 4,000 seats, the Met is an enormous house. Speaking of enormous, I do hope that the costumers gave him a padded suit to play Rivera. I would hate to think that he let himself go to the point that he now has the physique of Fred Mertz. Since Rivera generally looked like Darius Milhaud on a bad day, I would think that it was an artistic transformation.

    The skeletal dancers busted some very impressive moves. Some of them would not have been out of place in Michael Jackson’s “Thriller.” Even more astonishing was the ability of the dancers to stay in sync with one another in situations where they were either in cumbersome-looking, sight-obstructing masks or otherwise blocked from one another’s view.

    Music director Yannick Nézet-Séguin was in the pit. In his other role, as music director of the Philadelphia Orchestra, he’s had a wealth of experience conducting Frank’s music. He didn’t conduct with quite the brio he can sometimes bring, whether you want it or not, but here that wasn’t necessarily a bad thing. Really, it’s a more atmospheric piece. There was plenty of energy onstage, and Frank’s sound-world kept the ear engaged, with the character of Leonardo getting the most sensuous music. I confess, there were times, given the subject matter, that I wondered if I might be watching a dry run for Missy Mazzoli’s “Lincoln in the Bardo,” set to make its Met debut next season.

    Whether or not Frank’s opera will endure, no one can predict with any certainty, but experiencing it now at the Met is definitely worthwhile. You won’t leave the house (or the movie theater) whistling any of the tunes, but it is an absorbing magical realism experiment, and I think it works. I wouldn’t mind catching it again. Perhaps I will, at the movie theater.


    Incredibly, it turned out to be a two-opera weekend for me, as Friday evening I drove down to Wilmington for OperaDelaware’s concluding performance of Umberto Giordano’s “Andrea Chénier.” This was a more traditional, blood-and-thunder operatic experience, composed during the height of the verismo craze (the libretto is by frequent Puccini collaborator Luigi Illica), though set during the French Revolution.

    The work was sung with great passion by soprano Toni Marie Palmertree, tenor Dane Suarez, and baritone Gerald Moon. (Palmertree went for broke as Tosca at last year’s Princeton Festival; she’ll return to Princeton next month as Madama Butterfly – a role she sang this year at the Met!) Contralto Daryl Freedman deserves special mention for her poignant, showstopping aria as Madelon, a blind woman nearing the end of her days, who commits her grandson, the last of her line, to the cause of the Revolution.

    The opera was presented with minimal props, a few tables and chairs, and some bleachers in the courtroom scene. Singers were in period costume. Stylized, bisected windows formed the backdrop throughout, but the mood was varied, in no small part through skillful lighting, whether supporting a garish party of willfully oblivious aristocrats or doomed lovers languishing in a prison cell. Most effective was a silhouetted guillotine, an imaginative touch toward the end, its blade dropping with shattering finality at the curtain. The chorus sang lustily, lending the performance a sense of grandeur and scope.

    The experience was enhanced by the charmingly intimate and historic 1,140-seat Wilmington Grand Opera House. With its frescos and muraled ceilings, tiered wooden seats, and wraparound stalls and balcony, the theater embodies a kind of 19th century craftsmanship one rarely encounters these days. It’s practically a toy theater compared to the Met, more in line with what I imagine would have been the norm with many European houses, back in the day. Ingmar Bergman would have loved this place. Perhaps Wes Anderson too. What a great venue!

    The orchestra played well, if not impeccably. The fact that it did play so well made the (very) occasional cracked note in the pit serve as a reminder that this was, after all, live music-making, not karaoke, and I wouldn’t have had it any other way. The dramatic sweep of the performance was authentic and all the more compelling for it. How many freelance musicians and singers are out there, playing regional houses, and making music of this quality?

    Conductor Anthony Barrese directed a flowing, emotionally immediate performance. He generously offered the baton to an assistant for the opera’s eventful second act, citing the fact that he himself was only able to learn on the job and opportunities to do so in opera are scant. In the event – to my ears, anyway – the assistant acquitted himself beautifully. Barrese also provided one of the program booklet’s informative historical notes. He and outgoing general director Brendan Cooke, who share a rich history spanning decades and several opera companies, exchanged some poignant words before the evening’s performance. So not all the tears were on the stage!

    I should mention that the stage director, Octavio Cardenas, also contributed to the booklet. His thought-provoking introduction brings into focus the dangerous – and innately human – factors that contributed to the tragedy and violence of a political movement that turned into one of history’s most horrific bloodbaths. (Keep in mind, the opera was written scarcely a hundred years after the period in which it is set.)

    “This production of ‘Andrea Chénier’ is driven by a central question: what happens when idealism stops being a guiding principle and becomes a form of blindness? Set against the backdrop of the French Revolution, the opera is not presented as a celebration of political awakening, but as an examination of how moral certainty can harden into cruelty. The Revolution in this reading is not simply an historical force, but a mirror of human nature itself, capable of both aspiration and destruction, often at the same time.”

    And later…

    “Ultimately the production emphasizes that human nature resists purity. Even the most noble ideas are filtered through fear, desire, and self-preservation. The opera’s final moments do not offer resolution in a political sense, but instead reveal a more intimate truth: that love and cruelty, clarity and blindness, idealism and violence can coexist in the same human heart.”

    Bravo. And God help us all.

    ——–

    Gabriella Reyes raises the dead as Catrina in “El último sueño de Frida y Diego”


    Isabel Leonard as Frida


    Skeletons in rehearsal


    Five more performances of “Frida y Diego,” through June 5

    https://www.metopera.org/season/2025-26-season/el-ultimo-sueno-de-frida-y-diego/

    Can’t make it to New York? The Met Live in HD will bring it to select movie theaters, May 30 & June 3 (search by clicking the red bar beneath the banner, at the right of the screen)

    https://www.metopera.org/season/in-cinemas/2025-26-season/el-ultimo-sueno-de-frida-y-diego/

    OperaDelaware website (next season yet to be announced)

    https://www.operade.org/

  • Botstein, Dodging Bullets, Conducts Berlioz Edition of Weber’s “Der Freischütz”

    Botstein, Dodging Bullets, Conducts Berlioz Edition of Weber’s “Der Freischütz”

    One of the times I saw John Williams in concert, he conducted some selections from his then recently-composed score to the Disney “Star Wars” revival, “The Force Awakens.” In between numbers, he remarked to the audience that he would continue to write music for the next installment, “The Last Jedi.” When the applause subsided, he followed it up with a quip, something along the lines of he really didn’t want to do it; but he really didn’t want anybody ELSE to do it either.

    I remembered that on Thursday night when I was at Carnegie Hall to hear a concert performance of Hector Berlioz’s edition of Carl Maria von Weber’s “Der Freischütz.”


    Weber’s magnum opus, which took Europe by storm following its premiere in 1821, ignited a bold, new, Romantic era of lurid sensation in the opera house. German opera, in particular, would never be the same. The scenario and music reveled in an idealized past of roistering huntsmen and folk-like melodies, but also pushed into the darker territories of dread, emotional turmoil, and pacts with the Devil. The work traveled well, to New York, Rio de Janeiro, Cape Town, Sydney – everywhere it seems except Paris.

    Despite its near-universal appeal, “Freischütz” was dismissed by effete Parisians as being unsuited to their traditions. The Paris Opera forbade spoken dialogue, and the audience would have been scandalized had there not been a ballet in one of the later acts (a traditional diversion for aristocratic gentlemen who preferred to linger over supper, before settling into their boxes to ogle their mistresses among the dancers). As late as 1861, there were shouts of disdain when Wagner gave a big eff you to the French by placing his ballet at the beginning of “Tannhäuser.” When the second performance was disrupted by literal dog whistles, Wagner cancelled the rest of the run. If “Freischütz” were ever going to play Paris, it would require a major touch-up. And the Opera planned to do just that.

    Actually, it had been attempted once before at a rival house, the Théâtre de l’Odéon, in 1824, when Henri Castil-Blaze exercised a heavy hand in editing Weber’s original, cutting, reordering material, and even adapting vocal lines for a production retitled “Robin des Bois” – the French name for “Robin Hood,” even though the opera has nothing at all to do with the English folk hero.

    Berlioz was wild for “Freischütz,” to the extent that he lauded it in his memoirs and elsewhere as among his favorite operas. Unsurprisingly, he came to regard the Castil-Blaze version as an “insulting travesty, hacked and mutilated,” although enough of Weber’s magic remained, apparently, that he was compelled to attend several performances. Previously his operatic paragons had been the high-minded works of Christoph Willibald Gluck and Gaspare Spontini. Weber’s fantastic drama would have a profound influence on Berlioz’s subsequent development.

    Berlioz in 1845

    When Berlioz was approached by the Paris Opera to create his own edition of “Freischütz” (as “Le Freyschutz”) in 1841, he was not enthusiastic. Like Williams, who really didn’t want to do the next “Star Wars” movie, he feared what somebody else – somebody with less talent, less refinement, and less investment in the source material – might do with it. So Berlioz determined to commit to the project and worked hard to honor Weber’s legacy and actually make it good. And quite frankly, his version of the opera comes off better than anyone could ever hope.

    The title always sounds awkward in English. It’s often translated as “The Free-Shooter.” And the construction of the piece is about as clunky as the title would have you to expect. The work is not through-sung in the manner of a traditional opera, but rather it is a singspiel – you know, like Mozart’s “The Magic Flute” – with the arias, ensembles, and choruses linked by spoken dialogue. This has often posed a problem in recordings, as often it requires a major suspension of disbelief on a listener’s part to accept the actors who are assigned the spoken parts as analogous to the characters portrayed by singers of the roles. Also, for anyone who is not fluent in German, the spoken passages can very quickly wear out their welcome.

    So perhaps it is unsurprising – although it was a delightful surprise to me – that I actually found myself enjoying Berlioz’s edition more than Weber’s original. From a musical standpoint, it just goes down a whole lot easier, since Berlioz takes all those tiresome spoken lines and lends them musical interest by tastefully scoring them as recitative. “Der Freischütz” gains, therefore, from an unbroken musical flow. This might be considered blasphemous in some circles – no doubt German speakers will find more sustained interest in Weber’s original design – and for sure, there is a kind of bizarre alchemy that takes place if you allow yourself to think about the hybrid analytically. The sung French subtly changes the character of piece. The sound of the vocal lines is softened, and the text flows more mellifluously than it does when spiked with the harder, more intrusive consonants of German. And without drawing attention from Weber’s arias, Berlioz sustains and even enhances the atmosphere and dramatic momentum through his subtle artistry.

    In terms of the performance itself, listening to the execution of the overture on Thursday, I was reminded of Sir Thomas Beecham’s “two golden rules for an orchestra: start together and finish together. The public doesn’t give a damn what goes on in between.” It would have helped had the musicians been able to play with more commitment and intensity, to get the evening off to a good start. The horn passages were not particularly impressive, which was worrisome for an opera with plenty of exposed horn-playing, since after all it is brimming with huntsmen.

    Happily, whatever sense of foreboding instilled by the playing in the overture was dispelled immediately, as the horns were on point for the rest of the night. Furthermore, the performance ended strongly, with Leon Botstein and his musicians, especially the always superb Bard Festival Chorale (prepared by James Bagwell), tapped unsuspected reserves for the work’s Mozartian finale, which played like Sarastro’s grandest apotheosis ever. I didn’t see anything like it coming. So yes, it sent me out of the hall feeling uplifted and happy.

    The team of vocal soloists assembled for the evening included some familiar faces, from both American Symphony Orchestra and Bard Festival concerts. (Botstein directs both.) While I had my personal preferences, in terms of timbre, intensity, and projection, each had their individual strengths. The singers were mostly well-matched, but I found tenor Freddie Ballentine, in the lead role of Max, at his strongest in moments like his Act II trio, in which he blended sensitively his female costars.

    On a purely charismatic level, soprano Cadie Bryan – who sang Milada in last year’s production of Smetana’s “Dalibor” at Bard and here filled the supporting role of Annette – upstaged soprano Nicole Chevalier as her anguished cousin Agathe, whose character, let’s face it, is a real Debbie Downer. This despite the fact that Chevalier sang her arias beautifully.

    I’ve seen bass-baritone Alfred Walker a number of times, and he’s always very good – he had a meaty role as Saint-Saëns’ Henri VIII at Bard and also sang the King in “Dalibor” – but here, as Max’s duplicitous rival, he’s given less to do, especially since the opera in this performance was not staged. Essentially, the singers stood, sang, and emoted at their music stands.

    Naturally, where any concert performance of “Freischütz” suffers the most is in the celebrated Wolf’s Glen sequence, with its creepy midnight rendezvous to barter souls for magic bullets. There should be specters, thunder and lightning, owls roosting in withered tress, and an all-important human skull. Thursday night’s audience pieced out these imperfections with their thoughts, while one of the choristers (unidentified in the program, alas) offered diabolical interjections from the balcony as Satanic Samiel, the Black Huntsman.


    Among the supporting singers, baritone Adam Partridge as Kilian, a good-natured peasant who outshoots Max in the contest of the opera’s first act, had a great voice and a commanding presence, and bass Philip Cokorinos, a familiar presence, here as Kuono, head gamekeeper and Agathe’s father, sang his part with satisfying resonance.

    The whole plot hinges on Max winning a shooting contest so that he can attain job security (as worthy successor to Kuono) and Agathe’s hand in marriage. His poor luck at the start leaves him open to the temptations of Gaspar, who himself has sold his soul to Samiel, the Dark Huntsman, for some magic bullets. Gaspar hopes to delay his hour of reckoning by luring Max to damnation and Agathe along with him.

    While bass-baritone Jason Zacher, who towered physically over the rest of the cast as the Hermit, really didn’t have all that much to do – he only really gets to sing at the end – this deus ex machina character always amuses me in his earnestness. What I would pay to hear him break character and cry, “Wait! I was going to make espresso!”

    For the ballet music, Berlioz orchestrated Weber’s piano piece “Invitation to the Dance” – which, in its new guise, became a breakout hit, even if, technically, it seems as out-of-place as the Viennese waltz interlude Erich Wolfgang Korngold employs during the rustic banquet in “The Adventures of Robin Hood.” A universal truth: for as long as Berlioz’s arrangement has been around, and for as frequently as it’s been played, people still applaud before the quiet cello denouement.

    The opera’s performance, taken as a whole, was a satisfying one, and as always, Botstein and his players should be proud to have shared yet another unusual, not insignificant, indeed revelatory work with such a large audience. (The concert was well attended.)


    As is often the case, Botstein, who has been music director of the American Symphony Orchestra for 34 years, delivered a pre-concert talk an hour before the performance. As president of Bard College for over half a century, he has long been a master in the art of public speaking. He imparts his information articulately and with impressive fluency, and an off-handedness that belies the care and lucidity of his thought. Key to his success as a communicator, I think, is that he always somehow manages to keep the intellectual balancing act both conversational and engaging. He also has a wry sense of humor, and he’s not afraid to use it.

    When he returned to the stage for the performance itself, the audience received him warmly. There were no boos or catcalls or demonstrations – no indication at all of the emotional turbulence that has roiled Bard campus since his name has been linked with that of Jeffrey Epstein.

    In a nutshell, Botstein, as college president and its most prominent fundraiser, did everything he could to court Epstein, after the latter’s unsolicited donation of $75,000 to the institution. Although Botstein himself has not been accused of any criminal activity, his allegedly having turned a blind eye to Epstein’s six-years-earlier conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor has blown up at Bard since the release of the Epstein files, with outraged activists calling for him to step down. Botstein, who is pushing 80, but remains in good physical and mental health, has talked about retirement, with the possibility of him staying on to teach and conduct Bard’s graduate ensemble, The Orchestra Now. An independent investigation is ongoing.

    Botstein is scheduled to conduct a staged production of Richard Strauss’ “Die ägyptische Helena,” or “The Egyptian Helen,” at the school’s annual arts festival, Bard SummerScape, July 24-August 2. Presumably, he will then return to preside over this year’s Bard Music Festival, “Mozart and His World,” August 7-16, although the marketing so far has been very quiet regarding his hopeful participation.

    Botstein, of course, makes a specialty of resurrecting unusual and neglected repertoire. Mozart is unusually down-the-middle for him, but Bard is celebrated for its curve balls. We’ll see what they do with it.

    Incredibly, Thursday was the first time the Berlioz edition of “Der Freischütz” had ever been presented in the United States. There were no projected supertitles during the performance. Rather, the America Symphony Orchestra did it the old-fashioned way, with the complete French-English libretto included as an insert in the program booklet. I found it surprising, although it is certainly an incentive for me to hang onto mine. (It tickles me to see Wolf’s Glen, the haunted ravine where all the supernatural business goes down, translated as Gorge du Loup.) I am astonished to find there has been only one recording of the Berlioz edition. From what I gather, it is worth having for the curiosity value, even if the performance itself isn’t on a level with any of the primary recommendations of the standard German version.

    For as welcome a discovery as it was – and I would attend a performance of it again in a heartbeat – the sung dialogue and added ballet music made for a long evening, with three acts of roughly 50 minutes each and one intermission. With stopped traffic at the Lincoln Tunnel, I finally decided to take a chance and zip down to the Holland Tunnel, which turned out to be a big mistake. Even though by then it was after midnight, I don’t know how many lanes were funneling in from how many different directions, but once inside the tunnel there was construction, and everything was down to a single lane. It was nearly 2:00 by the time I arrived home in Princeton. More than once, my glacial escape from New York made me wish for one of Samiel’s magic bullets.

    But I will always have the memory of the night’s performance, capped by that rousing ending, with singers and instrumentalists joined in a grand finale that would have done Sir Thomas Beecham proud. It’s the kind of experience that makes attending a live musical event, under whatever circumstances, worthwhile.

    Weber in 1825

    ——-

    “The Egyptian Helen” at Bard SummerScape, July 24-August 2

    https://fishercenter.bard.edu/series/the-egyptian-helen/

    “Mozart and His World” at the Bard Music Festival, August 7-16

    https://fishercenter.bard.edu/what…/bard-music-festival/

  • “The Crucible,” Unfortunately, Never Goes Out of Style

    “The Crucible,” Unfortunately, Never Goes Out of Style

    This lighthearted photo isn’t actually what I had planned to post today, but I think it suits the mood for April Fools’. Here I am on the left, in the lobby of George Washington University’s Lisner Auditorium this past Sunday, with Mather Pfeiffenberger on the right, during intermission at the final performance of Robert Ward’s 1963 Pulitzer Prize winning opera “The Crucible,” presented by Washington National Opera.

    Between us is a gentleman who identified himself in his contact info (presented so that I could send him a copy of the photo) only as “Crucible Puritan Guy.” It turns out he’s Gary O’Connor, a DC resident who also frequently attends performances at the Met. An opera cosplayer of sorts, Gary has also worn theme costumes to performances of “Die Frau ohne Schatten” (complete with faux falcon), “Lohengrin,” “Der Rosenkavalier” (in silver face paint), “Tosca,” and “Tristan und Isolde” (with the “Tristan chord” on the sail of a headdress resembling a dragon boat).

    Of course, there’s nothing foolish about “The Crucible” itself. Adapted from the Arthur Miller play, it’s perennially, chillingly relevant (people are people, after all, no matter what era they live in), but especially so now. Ward’s opera is inexorable, riveting, and powerful, with a dramatic sweep that makes it seem almost like American verismo.

    It was certainly well-cast, with J’Nai Bridges and Ryan McKinny as the ill-fated Proctors, who manage to wrest grace and redemption from the Salem Witch Trials. There were good voices throughout, with the men (including McKinny as John Proctor, Chauncey Packer as Judge Danforth, and Nicholas Huff as Giles Corey) carrying especially well. I had my concerns at the start, as some of the voices were muddied as the singers moved upstage, but everyone soon rose to the occasion. I am sorry to have to leave out some of their names, but I didn’t really intend this as a review.

    I will add, however, they were also good actors, with Lauren Carroll exuding menace and unpredictability as Abigail Adams. Bridges has some great moments, especially touching in the final scene, which concludes “He have his goodness now. God forbid I take it from him.”

    Robert Spano conducted in the cramped pit, and the musicians played well. Had I not been made aware of it in another write-up, I would never have known that the brass and percussion had to be piped in from another room.

    Bravo to Washington National Opera, now free of the Kennedy Center. Hopefully they’ll be back, if there’s anything left of the performing arts complex, a memorial to fallen president John F. Kennedy, under a different administration.

    It’s shameful that the Washington Post, now under the ownership of Jeff Bezos, did not review “The Crucible.” Then, all the qualified music people have been driven out.

    “West Side Story” will conclude the WNO season, at Lyric Baltimore and the Music Center at Strathmore, May 8-15. If I remember correctly the organization’s 2026-27 season will be announced on May 5. For more information, visit https://washnatopera.org/.

    Robert Ward’s “The Crucible” is no laughing matter, but Gary the Crucible Puritan Guy brought some welcome levity to a gorgeous DC afternoon. If only it didn’t take me 4 ½ hours to drive home!

  • Beguiling New Music with the Princeton Symphony Orchestra

    Beguiling New Music with the Princeton Symphony Orchestra

    If you needed a reminder of just how good an orchestra the Princeton Symphony Orchestra is, you needed look no further than this past weekend’s concerts, in which the ensemble played two new works with such commitment that you would have sworn that they are standard repertoire.

    “Extra(ordinarily) Fancy,” composed in 2019-20 by Princeton alumnus and Curtis graduate Viet Cuong is so much fun, it would not have been out of place among the riotous offerings on a Hoffnung Music Festival concert. Except, unlike the works on those overtly comedic outings, the piece never descends into parody. What we have are two oboe soloists, positioned before a chamber orchestra, complete with harpsichord continuo, embarking on what seems like a piece of ersatz Baroque music, but soon engaging in a battle of wills as one of the oboists decides to spice things up with multiphonics (an extended technique in which the player produces multiple tones at once).

    The contagion creeps across the entire orchestra, augmented by xylophones, Leroy Anderson “Sleigh-Ride” style slapsticks, and bass drum. It also ramps up the dance inflections inherent in the ordinarily somewhat lugubrious Baroque passacaglia (itself with roots in courtly dances of 17th century Spain). The soloists, PSO principal oboist Lillian Copeland and Erin Gustafson struck just the right tone, metaphorically speaking, with first rate musicianship and some playful reactions to the discords, employing just enough restraint to get the humorous point across without distracting from the music with too much mugging. Furthermore, at ten minutes, the piece does not outstay its welcome. It’s a great curtain-raiser and deserves wider popularity.

    That was followed by the world premiere of a new harpsichord concerto by Princeton resident Julian Grant. The title, “Vaudeville in Teal,” is meant to tip us off not to expect a three-movement concerto in the classical mold, but rather a kind of sequence of varying moods and character that Grant sees as musically analogous to the vaudevilles that were popular around the turn of last century.

    As he described it to me when we discussed it last week, “It’s rather like a show with lots of disparate acts. You know, like the old-fashioned vaudevilles used to be. You’d have someone come on and do bird impressions, there’d be a flea circus from Russia, Anna Pavlova would do ‘The Dying Swan,’ you know. Some singer would come on and sing ‘O sole mio.’ I just imagined that the piece would be kind of slightly random sections.”

    The movements are given one-word titles, some of them rather whimsical especially in relation to the content: “Curtain,” “Tarantella,” “Threesome,” “Fairies,” “Spiel,” and “Follies.” These flow into one another without break.

    Despite the droll concept, you’d have to listen hard to detect anything arch or campy in the music itself. For all Grant’s playfulness, there’s no question it’s a serious piece. Moreover, it is a much more cohesive work than the “vaudeville” conceit would suggest. At the core of Grant’s musical output are 20 operas. So attuned is he to a sense of line that I think it must have carried over to his episodic concerto.

    The work is ingeniously scored for harpsichord, string orchestra, obbligato bass clarinet, and bassoon, as the handling of these self-imposed “restrictions” proved masterful. Who knew there could be so many colors to be drawn from such a limited palette? (Speaking of color, the use of “Teal” in the title is much less mysterious than it might at first be assumed: it’s the color of Grant’s harpsichord!) Furthermore, the composer deploys his forces in such a way that he repeatedly sidesteps a major pitfall in writing for such a conversational instrument, as it could easily be drowned out by a modern orchestra. It was fascinating to observe all the ways he managed to address this potential limitation. Even so, the harpsichord was unobtrusively amplified.

    Principal clarinetist Pascal Archer (on the bass clarinet) and principal bassoonist Brad Balliett played, alone and in tandem, with gorgeous, often ruminative expressiveness throughout. In fact, everyone was given ample opportunities to shine. The work begins and ends with a figure on double bass, played on the weekend concerts by PSO principal John Grillo. Grillo also had a significant part in “Threesome,” as one third of a trio with bassoon and harpsichord. Concertmaster Basia Danilow was required to step up, figuratively speaking, for glinting solos in “Tarantella” and “Follies.” Periodically the atmospheric strings would snap into focus for satisfying passages that seem to share a spiritual kinship with Béla Bartók and Benjamin Britten. “Spiel” was a spotlit moment for harpsichord alone.

    The bass contribution was not the only recurring signpost. There was also a unifying three-note motif to help orient the listener and a kind of recitative played on the harpsichord, notably at the beginning of “Threesome” and again toward the end of the piece.

    The eminent harpsichordist Mahan Esfahani was seated in profile to the audience. (Often in Baroque music, the instrument is at the center of the orchestra, with the player facing forward, the keyboard hidden, as was the case in Cuong’s piece.) Esfahani did not play the fabled teal harpsichord, but rather another instrument from the same company, black on the outside, but the raised lid revealing a painted maritime scene.

    This was not your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandparents’ harpsichord concerto. Esfahani played with the commitment and intensity of a piano soloist, several times rising in the bench as if it were a saddle on a galloping horse because of the expressive demands of the piece. Virtuosic fingerwork on two manuals produced subtle shifts in timbre, especially in moments when he played croisée (depressing notes on the two keyboards at the same time) or repositioned stop levers, kind of like an organist, making the instrument sound more like a lute or a harp. In addition, he frequently adjusted the upper keyboard to engage the instrument’s coupler mechanism (that couples the manuals together).

    I should mention, the concerto was actually commissioned by the Manitoba Chamber Orchestra and its music director Anne Manson, who will perform the work with Esfahani this Wednesday (tomorrow) in Winnipeg. That Princeton was granted the premiere was due to a combination of logistics, Esfahani’s flexibility, and Manson’s generosity, as well as her long relationship with the composer.

    It says something about how stimulating the music and performances were on the concert’s first half that Igor Stravinsky’s “Pulcinella” – presented after intermission in its rarely-heard complete form – came across, to this listener anyway, as somewhat anticlimactic. Don’t get me wrong: I love “Pulcinella.” As I’ve commented before, this is Stravinsky for people who don’t like Stravinsky, a ballet based on what the composer thought were tunes of Baroque master Giovanni Battista Pergolesi (since found to be misattributed). It’s endlessly melodic, frequently buoyant, and ultimately uplifting music. Stravinsky brings the 18th century source material up to date through the playful use of 20th century rhythms, cadences, and harmonies. It is indeed a felicitous, time-hopping marriage.

    Even so, the composer took all the best music and put it into a more frequently-performed concert suite (which the PSO has done in the past), and I can’t say the vocal parts really add all that much to it. That’s not to cast shade on the concert’s soloists, soprano Aubry Ballarò, tenor Nicholas Nestorak, and bass-baritone Hunter Enoch, who did well with what they had to do. Ballarò has a lovely voice, which she employs beautifully, but the words were somewhat lost, even in the intimate setting of Princeton University’s Richardson Auditorium, in a pastoral solo about a pining shepherdess. (The text is in Italian anyway, and there were supertitles throughout.) However, she blossomed in duets or trios with the men’s more powerful instruments.

    Ballarò and Nestorak are veterans of the Princeton Festival. She sang Fiordiligi in “Cosi fan tutte” in 2024, and he appeared as Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia in Derek Wang’s “Scalia/Ginsberg” in 2022 and as Spoletta in “Tosca” last year. Next month, Ballarò will sing Violetta in “La traviata” at Opera Columbus, with the PSO’s Rossen Milanov in the pit. Earlier this season, she performed Strauss’ “Four Last Songs” under Milanov’s baton with the Chautauqua Symphony Orchestra. Ballarò and Nestorak will reunite with Milanov and the Columbus Symphony in May to perform Carl Orff’s “Trionfo di Afrodite” (“Triumph of Aphrodite).

    Nestorak has been on the roster of the Metropolitan Opera since 2021. Enoch, with his pleasingly resonant voice, recently sang in Fabio Luisi’s “Ring” Cycle with the Dallas Symphony Orchestra, even stepping in for Mark Delavan to cover Wotan! The “Ring” performances are being prepared for commercial release.

    Back in Princeton: It was a joy to have Copeland and Gustafson, the oboe soloists in Viet Cuong’s piece, back in the woodwind section for “Pulcinella.” They engaged in a few duets there, as well, and Copeland brought an extra degree of elegance to her solos. All of the winds and brass had their moments, but the trombonist, Connor Rowe, really stole the show, thanks in no small part to Stravinsky’s writing, but he definitely brought something extra to it.

    Milanov conducted with his usual fluency, at his best possibly in Grant’s piece, which, as a world premiere, had to be deciphered and put together very quickly. It required an opera conductor’s sense of spontaneity and flow to really allow the solos and the interplay with the various instruments to really breathe. It was expertly managed. “Pulcinella” was well-played and, again, a very good performance, but I have heard others with more snap. This is not a technical criticism, merely an interpretive observation. The piece was presented with clarity and grace, wholly befitting its Baroque antecedent, but with less emphasis on Stravinsky’s obsessive rhythmic precision and bite.

    All quibbling aside, this might just have been the most stimulating of the PSO’s concerts this season. To paraphrase “Henry V,” those who missed it (still a-bed on account of the time change, perhaps?) should think themselves accursed and hold their manhoods cheap.

    The PSO will conclude its season at Richardson on May 9 & 10, with Aaron Copland’s “Letter from Home,” Camille Saint-Saëns’ Cello Concerto No. 1 (with soloist Maja Bogdanović), and Sergei Prokofiev’s Symphony No. 5.

    For more information and a look at the orchestra’s 2026-27 offerings, visit princetonsymphony.org. (See the dropdown menu under “Tickets and Events.”)

  • John Williams’ Piano Concerto at the New York Philharmonic

    John Williams’ Piano Concerto at the New York Philharmonic

    It wasn’t until 6 p.m. Saturday that it occurred to me I might have a concert in New York City on Sunday. The thought popped into my head as I was adjusting some magnets on the refrigerator in order to lift the page on the calendar and have a glimpse at March.

    Huh. No musical events listed until the weekend.

    But I knew I had committed to see Emanuel Ax perform John Williams’ new piano concerto at the New York Philharmonic, and I thought it was sometime around the beginning of the month. So I went to the calendar I carry with me in my computer bag, and lo and behold, there it was, scrawled on March 1, at 2 p.m. Somehow I had missed it when copying over my appointments to the other calendar!

    How could that possibly happen? If you’re wondering why it didn’t pop up on my Google calendar, then you really don’t know Classic Ross Amico. I still chisel all my commitments onto stone tablets.

    Be that as it may, my mind immediately shifted into business mode. Should I drive or take the train? What time should I leave? What do I need to do in the morning? If I drive, where do I park? Where should I grab lunch? What should I eat, and when, in order to satisfy hunger without inducing drowsiness during the performance? How should I time my afternoon coffee? Shouldn’t I be thinking about getting to bed?

    In the end, I decided to drive. Meters are free in New York on Sunday, and it turned out to be a lovely day, weather-wise, despite a chance of rain and snow in the morning forecast. So I zipped in, in about 70-75 minutes, Giuseppe Sinopoli conducting the “Enigma Variations” on my CD player, and parked on the street, a stone’s throw from Lincoln Center, at around 12:30. A grab-and-go lunch later, I had strolled as far north as Verdi Square, to have a glimpse at the monument in the March Sunday sunshine, despite a chill in the air, its warm glow promising the imminent arrival of spring. I visited the Strand Bookstore at its satellite at 2020 Broadway to grab a cup of coffee and run my eye over the sidewalk stalls, and then headed back down to Geffen Hall by 1:30.

    There, I met my concert companion, H. Paul Moon, who was very kind to make all the ticket arrangements, and we made our way to our seats on the second tier, stage right (the left side of the auditorium). How narrow and perilous the path was, with a single row of seats angled for an easier view of the stage and a low rail beckoning me to just end it all already.

    But I resisted.

    The conductor of the program was the somewhat elfin Lithuanian Mirga Gražinytė-Tyla, a Dudamel protégée in Los Angeles, who spread her wings as music director of the City of Birmingham Symphony Orchestra. Youthful and expressive, at times capricious even, she manages to stay tethered to reality, with interpretive decisions that seem grounded in practicality. It’s afterward, as she acknowledges the musicians, that she extends an open palm to the various sections and players, as if to offer them fey honey cakes.

    The concert opened with Ralph Vaughan Williams (yay!): his “Fantasia on a Theme by Thomas Tallis,” with nine string players sequestered upstage, behind the larger body of musicians, the better to achieve the work’s antiphonal effects.

    The work suggests the interplay of sacred voices in a cathedral, evocative of Renaissance church music, yet at the same time manages to convey kind of a transcendent radiance that lends it a certain timelessness. The music sways and swells in its Phrygian modality, alternating between austerity and a certain lushness that parallels the bygone English countryside so often celebrated and idealized by the pastoral school. Hearing it again only confirms its greatness. There’s a reason it’s Vaughan Williams’ most famous piece (alongside “The Lark Ascending”).

    Gražinytė-Tyla’s interpretation was gorgeous without teetering into sentiment. Hers was a holistic approach. Unlike some, she didn’t attempt to whip the music into ecstasies. But as with all the great works, the piece stands up to different interpretive philosophies.

    Stepping off the podium to acknowledge the musicians, the conductor was again full of smiles and asides to the first chair players. She seems to be a positive force, and though the Philharmonic has been known to be notoriously jaded, they responded well to her.

    Here’s an excerpt of Gražinytė-Tyla conducting Vaughan Williams in Birmingham.


    Next came John Williams – no relation to Vaughan Williams, though based on some of his film scores, the composer clearly admires English music.

    It’s probably safe to say that few from the “Star Wars”/”Harry Potter” crowd that attend performances of Williams’ concert works are going to come out of them feeling wholly satisfied. Not that there aren’t touches in his concert music that could betray the voice of the composer to those exceptionally well-versed in his film scores. But there are no heroic marches or sweeping love themes. More often, the music is impressionistic, rather than cinematic.

    In this new work, Williams also risks disappointing the jazz crowd, as each of the three movements is tied to an admired jazz pianist – Art Tatum, Bill Evans, and Oscar Peterson – all of whom Williams heard live. It might be perceived as another bait-and-switch, as there is very little “jazz” in it. Or when there is, it’s been internalized, processed, and given back as something else. Williams takes as his starting point his memories of the essence of each of these keyboard titans.

    He certainly gives the soloist plenty to do, in a cadenza-heavy first movement and another virtuosic cadenza at the end. Of course, there’s more to classical piano than leaping technical hurdles and playing fast and loud, so there are also introspective passages and reflective interludes throughout. Emanuel Ax played the piece with the safety net of sheet music, but he did so with such confidence that it made you wonder why he thought it necessary.

    When it comes to Williams’ concert music, which he has been writing since the 1960s, prior to his blockbuster successes as a film composer, one almost feels as if he protests too much, and for as much as I love just about every note this guy ever wrote (with a few exceptions), I sometimes wish he would indulge his natural melodic gift more in his concertos. I would recommend the Tuba Concerto as a good starting point for the uninitiated. His other works have lyrical passages – some more than others – but few will leave you humming.

    For me, the work under consideration becomes more appealing as it progresses. In the second movement, the piano supports the principal viola (here Cynthia Phelps), who is given a substantial lyrical passage, before the movement gradually expands into the woodwinds and then the lower strings. Ax ruminates, until eventually the strings begin to swell. The woodwinds return, somewhat ethereally, and then the viola reappears to round off the movement.

    I also like how Williams builds up to the end of the piece. For as large as the orchestra is – with no less than six percussionists, another piano within the orchestra, and a celesta – it’s remarkable just how restrained and precise the composer is in conjuring the different timbres. Say what you want about John Williams, he’s a master colorist and the guy really knows his way around the orchestra. More viscerally, he does give us a race to the finish and a satisfying “bang” to let us know when to applaud.

    That Williams, who turned 94 on February 8, still has the intellectual rigor to pull off a work on this scale is astonishing. The concerto was introduced by Ax at Tanglewood last summer. Word is that a recording was made for commercial release. If you’re interested in checking it out, the premiere performance is posted on YouTube.



    If you want to hear it live, Ax will be bringing it to the Philadelphia Orchestra next season.

    The piano has always been Williams’ own instrument. He studied seriously with Juilliard’s Rosina Lhévinne, while also playing jazz piano and serving as a session pianist for innumerable singers. From well before he was a household name, you can hear him playing on the soundtracks to “Peter Gunn,” “Breakfast at Tiffany’s,” “West Side Story” (the film), “The Big Country,” “To Kill a Mockingbird,” and so many others. This is a man who’s had nine creative lives.

    One wonders what kind of concerto he would have written for the keyboard had he tackled it 40 years earlier. But what we’ve got is a good one, even if it will never enter the public consciousness the way his film scores have. At least it was written with dignity and craftsmanship, and it never teeters into kitsch.

    Even so, I can’t help but wonder what one of his concertos would sound like if he had he been writing a hundred years ago, when a significant number of major composers were still creating vital music in a tonal idiom. I’m all for composing a work that reveals more and more on repeated listening, but the surest way to get repeat performances is to be sure to give listeners something the first go-round that they’ll want to hear again.

    For an encore, Ax offered Schubert’s “Ständchen” (“Serenade”), which was beautifully played, an ideal palate-cleanser, even if some nearby idiot thought it necessary to hum along off-key.

    The second half of the program was devoted to the Symphony No. 5 by Mieczyslaw Weinberg, yet another composer who walked a perilous line in Soviet Russia. Weinberg fled the Nazi invasion of Poland – his parents and sister were killed – and throughout his life, even in “safety,” there were periods during which he weathered harrowing encounters with anti-Semitism and Stalin’s dangerous whims. Weinberg’s father-in-law was murdered by the secret police and he himself was arrested. His friend and colleague, Dmitri Shostakovich, went above and beyond, putting himself at risk to defend Weinberg to Stalin himself. Who knows what would have happened to Weinberg had Stalin not died unexpectedly.

    While clearly laboring under the same tense reality as Shostakovich and many of his peers, Weinberg’s creative voice is very much his own. It is notable in his symphony that he actually supplies some melodic material to the piccolo, as opposed to merely using the instrument expressively, to pierce the listener’s eardrums, as Shostakovich is prone to do. Furthermore, Weinberg doesn’t descend into grotesquerie. Even so, despite having been composed under Krushchev’s “thaw,” it is a gloomy work. Following the somber, unsettled adagio that forms the symphony’s second movement, I noted at least six people heading for the exits on the ground floor. It is certainly worthwhile music, however, and in its way, often quite beautiful.

    I probably have more Weinberg recordings in my library than most, but before yesterday I confess I had not heard the Symphony No. 5. There are a number of recordings of it on YouTube.



    Gražinytė-Tyla has been a steadfast Weinberg champion. Her first recording for Deutsche Grammophon was of Weinberg’s Symphonies Nos. 2 & 21. A subsequent release documents her performances of his Symphonies Nos. 3 & 7 and his Flute Concerto.

    Yesterday’s was quite a significant program – the last of a four-concert series, at that. Hats off to the New York Philharmonic for investing in such serious fare. Gražinytė-Tyla will continue with the orchestra, conducting music by György Kurtág (who just turned 100 last week), his “Brefs messages,” Elgar’s Cello Concerto (with soloist Vilde Frang), and Schumann’s Symphony No. 1 (the “Spring” Symphony), March 5-7.

    For those in search of unusual and neglected repertoire, with a welcome appetizer in the form of a delectable modern classic, this was one Sunday matinee that very much satisfied.

    Bravi, Mirga Gražinytė-Tyla and Emanuel Ax, and thank you, New York Philharmonic!

    ———

    Photo of Emanuel Ax and Mirga Gražinytė-Tyla, courtesy of Paul Moon

Tag Cloud

Aaron Copland (92) Beethoven (95) Composer (114) Film Music (123) Film Score (143) Film Scores (255) Halloween (94) John Williams (187) KWAX (229) Leonard Bernstein (101) Marlboro Music Festival (125) Movie Music (138) Opera (202) Philadelphia Orchestra (89) Picture Perfect (174) Princeton Symphony Orchestra (106) Radio (87) Ralph Vaughan Williams (85) Ross Amico (244) Roy's Tie-Dye Sci-Fi Corner (290) The Classical Network (101) The Lost Chord (268) Vaughan Williams (103) WPRB (396) WWFM (881)

DON’T MISS A BEAT

Receive a weekly digest every Sunday at noon by signing up here


RECENT POSTS