Category: Daily Dispatch

  • Schoenberg’s Gurre-Lieder at Carnegie Hall

    Schoenberg’s Gurre-Lieder at Carnegie Hall

    On Friday, I attended an all-too-rare performance of Arnold Schoenberg’s “Gurre-Lieder” at Carnegie Hall. I confess, I prefer the alternate spelling, without the hyphen, but since everything about “Gurre-Lieder” screams excess, I might as well swing for the fences. The American Symphony Orchestra was led by the indefatigable Leon Botstein, always one of my heroes for resurrecting underperformed repertoire and presenting it in a scholarly context. (Unfortunately, I missed the pre-concert talk.) Ostensibly, the Carnegie performance was planned to honor Schoenberg’s 150th birthday, the actual anniversary of which will fall in September. But any performance of “Gurre-Lieder” requires no excuse.

    This is not your grandpa’s Schoenberg – the high priest of dodecaphony who changed music forever and scared your grandma off buying tickets – but rather your great-grandpa’s Schoenberg – young, passionate, and all juiced up on Romanticism. Take Wagner, Strauss, and Mahler, toss them in a blender, and turn it up to 11. The composer embarked on the piece between 1900 and 1903 and completed it, after the interval of a few years, in 1911. The result is monumental post-Romanticism in its full flowering. The scoring itself is colossal, with vocal soloists, speaker, and three choruses. Its two-hour running time is epic and absorbing.

    “Gurre-Lieder” (“Songs of Gurre”) weaves texts by Jens Peter Jacobsen into a tapestry of doomed love, blasphemy, and damnation, unfurled at Castle Gurre in medieval Denmark. But it is a Middle Ages steeped in myth and legend. The work climaxes with a harrowing evocation of the Wild Hunt, with ghostly and supernatural beings roaring across the night sky, and concludes with an opulent sunrise.

    For all his laudable achievements, Botstein often takes heat for not being the most inspiring of conductors. It’s true, I didn’t feel quite as much juice radiating from the stage as I did the last time I heard the piece, with Simon Rattle, at Philadelphia’s Academy of Music in 2000. But Carnegie is a much larger hall. Acoustically, the vocalists were difficult to hear, from my vantage in the Dress Circle; but one would have to be the most reckless of heldentenors even to attempt to pierce the sonic blast of a 150-piece orchestra.

    Even so, all of the singers had their moments. The efforts of Dominic Armstrong to convey the ardor, brooding, and bitterness of King Waldemar were often frustrated by being swallowed up by his instrumental neighbors. He was best heard in the second half as, bereft at the murder of his mistress, Tove, by his wife, Queen Helvig, Waldemar essentially shakes an angry fist at God. For this, the king is condemned for all eternity to lead a pack of ghosts and reanimated skeletons on a nightly, hell-for-leather tour about the gloomy castle and its environs.

    The fearful sight is recounted by a pious Peasant, sung on Friday by bass-baritone Alan Held. Held was easier to make out, since Schoenberg’s orchestration of the latter half of the oratorio is more forgiving, in some regards, the composer having returned to complete the work after a hiatus, during which he obviously learned a thing or two about transparency.

    Carsten Wittmoser, as the speaker, supplied the uncanny narration in sprechstimme, an eerie netherworld of blended speech and song, which Schoenberg would explore more fully in “Pierrot Lunaire.”

    In one of those grotesque comic interludes of a kind seemingly so popular among Central European post-Romantics, tenor Brenton Ryan came across best among the male soloists, as he went the furthest to inhabit his part as Klaus the Fool. You really could imagine this jester being swept along against his will, face-to-tail, on horseback.

    Of the women, the palm went to Krysty Swann as the melancholy Wood Dove, who delivers the news of Tove’s death. Felicia Moore, as Tove, again had to push against the orchestra, though she seemed to be a good choice for the role. Both successfully landed their high notes.

    The chorus – though it seemed smaller than what I am accustomed to seeing in this work (I count 80 singers in the program; Schoenberg called for 200) – was appropriately rowdy and powerful when needed.

    No team of unamplified singers is ever going to go up against “Gurre-Lieder” in a hall of that size and be heard by everyone. Under the circumstances, supertitles would have been a great help and a sensible choice. Instead, the audience muddled through the old-fashioned way, with the very wordy text reproduced in the program in microscopic font to be discerned in semi-darkness.

    By coincidence, Friday also happened to be the anniversary of the birth of Werner Klemperer, son of conductor Otto Klemperer and two-time Emmy Award winner for his memorable turn as Colonel Klink on “Hogan’s Heroes.”

    Klemperer provided the sprechstimme as the Speaker on the late Seiji Ozawa’s recording of “Gurre-Lieder,” appearing alongside James McCracken, Jessye Norman, and Tatiana Troyanos. The recording was taken from a live performance, so it may well be the same as the one on this video, or at the very least it was taken from the same series of concerts. Klemperer makes his entrance at around 1 hour and 34 minutes in. And yes, he speaks fluent German.

    What you see in the video is wonderful, of course, but it is but a pale reflection of the visceral impact of experiencing the work live.

    I saw Klemperer (the son, not the father, alas) in person several times, narrating Beethoven’s “Egmont” with the Philadelphia Orchestra, playing the Majordomo (another speaking role) in a concert performance of Strauss’ “Ariadne auf Naxos,” again with the Philadelphia Orchestra, and as emcee for a starry gala for the Opera Company of Philadelphia – all at the old Academy of Music. I missed him in his Tony-nominated turn as Herr Schultz in the 1987 Broadway revival of “Cabaret” – which my parents attended – because I chose to hear the New York Philharmonic that night. (Kent Nagano conducted George Benjamin’s “Ringed by the Flat Horizon” and Béla Bartók’s “The Wooden Prince,” and Bella Davidovich was the soloist in Chopin’s Piano Concerto No. 2.)

    As I said, the last time I heard “Gurre-Lieder” live was in Philadelphia in 2000, with Simon Rattle conducting. The audience was whipped into ecstasies with that one. Most memorably, in the moment’s silence following the last decay of the music, and just before the explosion of frenzied applause, there came from somewhere in the balcony a deeply satisfied “YEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH!”

    The Philadelphia Orchestra gave the work its first American performance under Leopold Stokowski in 1932. Needless to say, because of the forces involved, and the expense in mounting it, it is seldom done, but when it is, it pleases the crowd mightily.

    Happy belated birthday, Werner Klemperer (1920-2000), and thank you, Leon Botstein and the ASO!

    Werner’s dad conducting Schumann in Philadelphia

    I’ve written about Otto Klemperer many times on this site, as here:

    https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=1844909085676373&set=basw.AbpuDWzgKAkm3TnfgzQN9VOGciZh068VBmrEC7s6TZuOvY0sWP2WF65SWXdWvtPNl6UCFpVXon4JgBoPB7u-aMAhzDmHFuyeybByVgYBV44emn5MDHkc4woxlj1YKmzdbQVSErSOVvES01qL7mMlKN60pXCUOh8qZzl4h6trZoBN-n2-RxSWtACCnjor6Bv0KGg&opaqueCursor=AboKz2dejQ1QKxjJ3ZL-8qoWhLQ-ztweo9I-KkJj8ZokdKTf_ZpMGRNjk4oVHO2y2CcfPTdhpZyU1ieD1Z0xsw8x-9YsfVFb62KvmZRCm-VoaJogaKSEBfghzlZgXU_uaSA1EM5PsPr5Ahf_nUgzcj8EjKJSTgLhieT1O7OYp-tV8ieRxXXvOKZEgz6TFmFWxr5HZIvbablb42PklPcJeLJ4hfMRfKdWRJkeRBES69EBxIMGR41oUMFkmvEwxY2tnWP8rHj-RSNB_Oeml7DG_trUqiOWZ-hRS-2xjYlX4LUfX6wWfZYFQKHJHAeJF2sX95lHDtHFtCJcyM2g3gDHnnP2tzmsUt-55Cu393Naddj9TI5bX5vx159UKm7mfcuRZl00ycfyLW6KXwZxuCgoj9XHcc0KRpLnvw2QAmfuEBAxq_xx7zSL-PjxOvvhZlY3FBt88o9l5a5Xs2KSQuX2Q8Yb3xo9x-IW1KsSUL_Qpo_pjXQ8Uwsq1uysmCK0_DB2LmL06WcYWJT0MPhOeUZV6slrKVF3fe2S2c2TPgLGfpqLBk84t_yTR2QpjFf4Fk4HNCt871ShxLTxYDBTPN_c4WmAxi5ZysTxnV85RlHiDJB0Yp7pAiHl3LWjuVTPzRj1JTJ3kcXg1ML4e5fLwKCF4qR64sY7AuN4eblsnwn4rR7psQfLWXx_n60KORyc5jAirsse7eqy95OGaunXQK4pVsfc

  • Anne Brontë’s “Wildfell Hall”: A Tormented Valentine

    Anne Brontë’s “Wildfell Hall”: A Tormented Valentine

    On Sunday, I finally completed Anne Brontë’s ‘’The Tenant of Wildfell Hall” – all blessed 489 pages of it – successfully wrapping up my third consecutive, tormented year with the Brontës for Valentine’s Day.

    First of all, let me say there doesn’t seem to have been a weak link between the Brontë sisters, in regard to their respective talents as writers. Indeed, since the sisters published under pseudonyms (Currer Bell for Charlotte, Ellis Bell for Emily, and Acton Bell for Anne), it was often speculated, early on, that the three were the same person. So perhaps there’s a powerful argument to be made for growing up in comparative isolation and having to make your own entertainment, with only your siblings, the moors, a good library, and a single, working father with progressive ideas about freedom and a sound education to sustain you. Being the offspring of a minister also ensured a fluency in recalled bible passages, which are alluded to frequently throughout the Brontës’ writings, not least in “Wildfell Hall.”

    For me, the great weakness of Anne’s novel (her second, after “Agnes Grey”) is in its structure. So compelling is the book’s miserable second act, that it makes the framing device, especially the ending, seem almost precious by comparison. Loosely epistolary in nature (employing a narrative device of telling the story through letters and journal entries), the novel conveys its information to the reader through two of its central characters. And one of them, the panting George Markham, is as problematic in his way as the rakish Arthur Huntingdon. Is he really any more a fulfilling match for Helen than her husband (abusive S.O.B. that he is)?

    To be fair, in the passages narrated by Markham, the character’s obsessive, frequently cloying, quasi-adolescent protestations of love for Helen are understandably central to his thoughts; but how often does he actually think about HER? Whereas Helen, with all her suffering, comes across as someone of much greater substance. She certainly displays more resilience in a society where the rules are stacked against women, whose fortunes, in all senses, are basically tied up with their husbands or fathers. If a woman winds up in a bad marriage, she’s stuck, and Helen marries a monster.

    But face it, that’s why we love the Brontës, for the tempest-tossed heroines who can’t seem to resist the storm. Unfortunately, Arthur possesses neither the wounded nobility of Rochester nor the demonic fury of Heathcliff. Nor, sadly, does George. What compels is Helen’s degradation in an isolated, loveless, often empty mansion. I suppose it’s a metaphor to some extent for her unrequited love for a scoundrel who is in no way worthy of it.

    The first act reads almost like a Jane Austen novel, with all the gossip and social maneuverings of a rural community of farmers, clergymen, and gentlefolk. The third is a pat, precious denouement. But it is in the long central portion, which doesn’t begin until about 150 pages in, in which Helen Huntingdon tells the tale of her harrowing marriage to the scapegrace Arthur (via her journal), that “Wildfell Hall” becomes so horribly compelling, as the narrator details the mounting degradation and hopelessness of her union.

    This is my fourth Bronte novel, actually, having read Charlotte’s “Shirley” a little over 30 years ago, when taking a graduate course on the Victorian novel. In her way, Helen has been received as a cutting-edge feminist, within the strictures of the Victorian social order, as would be Charlotte’s heroine. (Formerly the name Shirley had had masculine associations; that changed largely with the success of Charlotte’s novel, which was published in 1849, the year after “Wildfell Hall.”) But Helen’s options are sadly few. The extent of her power is that she can close a door against her husband and harbor plans, with few resources, to escape in the night. Talk about you’ve come a long way, baby!

    She’s more resourceful than that, actually, as she also figures out a way to earn her own meager living – for as unlikely a means of financial sustenance as it is.

    Helen’s got courage and resolve to burn, but the depths of her strength are truly revealed in a decision she makes in the second half of the book that illustrates her extraordinary selflessness, forgiveness, and grace, especially after having been treated so poorly, and under conditions in which she essentially risks everything.

    I hate to use such a trendy label as “toxic masculinity,” but all the “gentlemen” seem to do in this book is hunt, gamble, carouse, and intimidate. At one point, even Markham, the “nice” alternative to Arthur, jealously brains a rival (who later turns out to be more than he seems).

    Am I glad I read it? Sure! I’d probably rank it below Emily’s “Wuthering Heights,” if only because of the insane twistedness of the latter’s characters and narrative. Anne certainly wants for nothing, in terms of writing ability and insight, but the character of Arthur never achieves the magnetic Byronism of Heathcliff – not that that was necessarily her aim. That said, for me, Charlotte’s “Jane Eyre” is still the champ, wholly satisfying as the quintessential gothic romance.

    Of the three, “Wildfell Hall” is the most unflinching in its realism. The sisters had plenty of first-hand experience with the trials and tribulations of debauchery, through the dissipation of their brother, Branwell. What’s remarkable is that Anne so well understood the wider social and romantic intricacies of the world beyond the parsonage. If the Brontës are anything to go by, finding employment as a governess must be very good training for a writer.

    Interestingly, Charlotte was not a big fan of “Wildfell Hall.” The siblings all died early: Emily in 1848 at 30, Anne in 1849 at 29, and Charlotte in 1855 at 38. Charlotte survived the longest, and she was not timid in her criticism of “Wildfell Hall.” She even went so far as to suppress its republication. When the book did appear again, the text was abridged and mutilated, and like the character of Helen herself, was subjected to even further indignities over the years. So do be cautious, if you’re shopping for a copy, even if it’s advertised as “complete and unabridged!”

    According to an afternote in my edition, a clothbound hardcover from Penguin Classics, the author’s personal copy of the first edition, with her handwritten notes and annotations, is housed at Princeton University Library (although there is some question as to whether or not the marginalia is in fact hers).

    Classic Ross Amico, reading the world’s classics, so you don’t have to!

    Now it’s well past time for me to sit down with a pad of paper and a biography of one of the key, though largely unsung, American instrumentalists of the 20th century, for an upcoming project I’m supposed to participate in, in earnest, beginning next week…

  • Bartók Pollini Ozawa San Francisco Symphony 1971

    Bartók Pollini Ozawa San Francisco Symphony 1971

    On Béla Bartók’s birthday, here’s quite a performance, with two artists we lost only recently – Maurizio Pollini, who died on Saturday at 82, and Seiji Ozawa, who died on February 6 at 88 – of his Piano Concerto No. 1, from a concert given by the San Francisco Symphony on April 16, 1971.

  • Péter Eötvös A Composer’s Conducting Genius

    Péter Eötvös A Composer’s Conducting Genius

    It’s been observed (and borne out) that composers are not always the best interpreters of their own music. But when composer Péter Eötvös turned his hand to conducting Beethoven, the result was one of the most thrilling 5th Symphonies I have ever heard.

    Eötvös, born in Transylvania, was aided and encouraged by Zoltán Kodály at the Franz Liszt Academy of Music in Budapest, and Béla Bartók was in his blood.

    He continued his studies in Cologne with Bernd Alois Zimmerman. He also apprenticed with Karlheinz Stockhausen, working as Stockhausen’s engineer and copyist, and kept up his modernist credentials as a founding member of the live electronics-heavy Oeldorf Group and director and conductor of the Pierre Boulez-founded Ensemble InterContemporain.

    In addition, he was drawn to the music of Renaissance madman and murderer Carlo Gesualdo and American jazz.

    Eötvös composed in many genres, including experimental music for film and at least 13 operas.

    To my ears, he was at least as good a conductor as he was a composer. Eötvös died yesterday at the age of 80. R.I.P.


    Conducting Liszt’s “Dante Symphony”

    His own “The Gliding of the Eagle in the Skies”

    “Dialog mit Mozart”

    Beethoven (each of the four movements posted separately)

    I https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nj7NYoVxceo

    II https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0SlWenglLw

    III https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFvpmRbFm_0

    IV https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qm5nuSwcMlM

    Eötvös speaks

  • Maurizio Pollini A Titan Passes

    Maurizio Pollini A Titan Passes

    In the aftershock of the death of any prominent musician, my thoughts inevitably wend their way to the question of who’s left? It’s been the case for me at least since the ‘90s, when the classical music world lost so many – all old friends, familiar from decades of recordings – and always the evidence seems to be of little cheer. Now, a little over a week after the death of the great pianist Byron Janis, I receive news of the loss of Maurizio Pollini.

    Pollini was renowned for his interpretations of Beethoven and Chopin, certainly, but for me he was more riveting when tackling modernist works. His albums of Webern’s Variations and Boulez’s Piano Sonata No. 2 and Stravinsky’s Three Movements from “Petrushka” and Prokofiev’s Piano Sonata No. 7, all combined when released on CD, are high points of his discography. He was also a champion of the music of Karlheinz Stockhausen and Luigi Nono.

    At his best, he had a way of making even standard repertoire seem experimental. He recorded a magnificent Liszt program, including the monumental Piano Sonata in B minor (surely the most radical sonata of its day), with a truly revelatory selection of the composer’s later, prophetic works that seldom, as under Pollini’s touch, pointed the way so assuredly to the 20th century.

    There was an aura about the man and the artist that exuded integrity, idealism, intelligence, and mystery, between his unwavering embrace of left-wing politics (he was an avowed communist), his notorious perfectionism (he refused to authorize recordings in which he perceived defects that no one else could hear), and last-minute cancellations (including one at Princeton’s McCarter Theatre in 2011).

    Again, the question: who’s left? Of the giants of Pollini’s generation, I mean – certainly of the stable of great pianists who kept the major labels (in Pollini’s case, Deutsche Grammophon) relevant?

    Maurizio Pollini was 82 years-old. An irreplaceable musician. I can’t say I was equally impressed with all of his Beethoven and Chopin, which could come across as a little clinical – I am more of the Janis camp than the Pollini – but when he connected, the rewards were cherishable. I, for one, am very thankful to be able to choose from his recordings. R.I.P.


    Chopin, Nocturne No. 8, Op. 27, No. 2 (live in concert)

    Liszt, “Unstern! Sinistre, Disastro”

    Boulez, Piano Sonata No. 2

    Young Pollini plays Beethoven’s “Emperor” Concerto (live)

Tag Cloud

Aaron Copland (93) Beethoven (95) Composer (114) Film Music (124) Film Score (143) Film Scores (255) Halloween (94) John Williams (188) KWAX (229) Leonard Bernstein (101) Marlboro Music Festival (125) Movie Music (139) Opera (202) Philadelphia Orchestra (89) Picture Perfect (174) Princeton Symphony Orchestra (106) Radio (87) Ralph Vaughan Williams (85) Ross Amico (244) Roy's Tie-Dye Sci-Fi Corner (290) The Classical Network (101) The Lost Chord (268) Vaughan Williams (103) WPRB (396) WWFM (881)

DON’T MISS A BEAT

Receive a weekly digest every Sunday at noon by signing up here


RECENT POSTS