Category: Daily Dispatch

  • Rethinking Mendelssohn’s Influence on Music History

    Rethinking Mendelssohn’s Influence on Music History

    I am starting to get just a little bit tired of hearing that if Felix Mendelssohn had never lived, music history would not have turned out any differently. He’s second-rate, he’s sentimental, he’s an academician, blah blah blah. When are these pompous idiots going to open their ears and acknowledge the fact that he was only one of the most influential composers of the 19th century? Especially in Germany, England and America, did any serious musician escape his sway?

    Mendelssohn was essentially adopted as England’s national composer. Figures from William Sterndale Bennett through Sir Arthur Sullivan gleefully played in his shadow. In fact, Mendelssohn was the hottest composer in England since Handel. Such a stranglehold did Handel and Mendelssohn have on English concertgoers’ affections that, in Germany, England was mocked as “Das Land ohne Musik” – The Land without Music. The best English composers were all German.

    But if the Germans were to be at all honest with themselves, they would have realized that all the best German composers were also followers of Mendelssohn. What about Wagner, you say, surely one of the most progressive composers who ever lived? There’s plenty of Mendelssohn in early Wagner. Ditto for Richard Strauss. As for the “second rank,” the more conservative school, just about everyone emulated Mendelssohn.

    Of himself, of course, Mendelssohn was one of the most astonishing of musical prodigies. He composed two of the most enduring masterpieces in the repertoire, the overture to a “Midsummer Night’s Dream” and the Octet for Strings, at 16 and 17 respectively. In terms of maturity and polish, these were certainly on a par with anything written by the teenaged Mozart.

    Yes, Mendelssohn was a traditionalist. He structured his music on foundations laid in the past. Even so, he cautiously ventured into the mists of Romanticism. Occasionally, he even subverted expectations, in works like his famous Violin Concerto. Furthermore, he was respectful, if not kind, to everyone, even those of whose music he disapproved.

    As a conductor, there’s no question he was one of the most influential musicians in Europe, if not the world. For twelve years, he led the Leipzig Gewandhaus Orchestra, an ensemble full of players who went on to distinction in their own right. He was admired for the precision of his performances. He was also the one who essentially drew up the blueprint for modern orchestras in developing a musical “canon.” He gave important premieres of music by his contemporaries, while also reviving works of Bach, Mozart, and Beethoven.

    In particular, he is credited with resuscitating the reputation of Johann Sebastian Bach, not only through his resurrection of the “St. Matthew Passion,” but in overseeing an edition of Bach’s organ works, along with an edition of Handel’s oratorios, both of which were published in England.

    So music history would have been quite different if not for Mendelssohn, thank you very much. He may not have been the most seismic of innovators, but there’s something to be said for being a master of one’s craft.

    Mendelssohn died in Leipzig, after a series of strokes, at the age of 38. Did he live up to his potential? Who among us is really qualified to judge? How much is one man expected to accomplish, anyway?

    No radio station in the world is going to devote a full day to Mendelssohn’s music. Since the death of Victoria, I don’t think Mendelssohn has ever really been fashionable, except perhaps at weddings. But who doesn’t love the overture to “A Midsummer Night’s Dream,” the Octet for Strings, the “Hebrides Overture,” the “Italian” Symphony, or the Violin Concerto in E minor?

    Morton Feldman once said, “The people you think are radicals might really be conservative. The people who you think are conservative might really be radical.”

    I don’t know that I would ever go so far as to label Mendelssohn a radical, but he most certainly did change the world, and those of us who love music would have been a lot poorer without him.

    Happy birthday, Felix Mendelssohn! Felix the burn, from 4 to 7 p.m. EST on WWFM – The Classical Network and wwfm.org.


    PHOTO: Another view of Mendelssohn

  • Shostakovich: Football, Stalin & Piano

    Shostakovich: Football, Stalin & Piano

    Of the great composers, none enjoyed football more than Dmitri Shostakovich. Russian football, that is. On one occasion he even invited the entire Leningrad Dynamo over to his apartment for dinner.

    This Sunday night on “The Lost Chord,” following the Super Bowl, tune in for selections from a 5-CD boxed set, on the Melodiya label, of Russian state recordings of Shostakovich performing his own music.

    Admittedly, emphasizing Shostakovich’s rabid enthusiasm for football is something of a bait-and-switch. The show just happens to air on Super Sunday and has nothing at all to do with the sport. However, Shostakovich really did love football (i.e. soccer) and all kinds of sports and games of chance. You can read more about it by following this link.

    https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2019/08/18/dmitri-shostakovich-football-fanatic-a66908

    Concerning the show itself, Shostakovich was a fabulous pianist, who, early on, eked out a living with his improvisations at a local cinema. He began serious studies at the age of 9, and continued, formally, at the Petrograd Conservatory, upon his acceptance there, at the age of 13. Once he began to receive international attention for his original compositions, for works such as his Symphony No. 1, written when he was only 19, his principal focus began to shift. He did, however, continue to perform and record his own music.

    The documents in this Melodiya set, “Shostakovich Plays Shostakovich,” are riveting, not only for the musicianship they enshrine, but also on account of their biographical fascination and their sense of history.

    Perhaps no Shostakovich recording is imbued with a greater sense of time and place than a 1954 performance of his Symphony No. 10. An arrangement, for piano four-hands, was played by the composer at his apartment with his close friend and neighbor Mieczyslaw Weinberg.

    Weinberg found himself in a very precarious situation only the year before. He was arrested on a charge of “Jewish bourgeois nationalism,” in connection with the so-called Doctor’s Plot, at the command of Stalin himself, on the pretense that Jewish doctors were planning to assassinate Soviet officials. Weinberg’s father-in-law had been implicated, and killed. Shostakovich attempted to intercede on his friend’s behalf, but it was only with the sudden and fortuitous death of Stalin in 1953 that Weinberg was officially rehabilitated, and released.

    In a piece of living history, these two artists sit down to perform on Shostakovich’s home piano. This is music that was claimed, in Solomon Volkov’s “Testimony,” Shostakovich’s alleged memoir, to be about Stalin and the Stalin years.

    The pianos used in some of these recordings may be a little rough around the edges, but they only lend to the neurotic intensity of the music-making. It’s also a kind of window into what it must have been like to have been a musician in Soviet Russia, between 1946 and 1958, commandeering whatever means of expression you could lay your hands on.

    I hope you’ll join me for “Black and White and Red All Over.” Shostakovich tickles the keys, this Sunday night at 10:00 EST, on WWFM – The Classical Network and wwfm.org.


    PHOTO: Shostakovich (lower right), with fellow Soviet football fans

  • Remembering Peter Serkin Rebel Pianist

    Remembering Peter Serkin Rebel Pianist

    I am stunned to learn of the death of Peter Serkin. As the confluence of two dizzyingly talented musical tributaries (his father was Rudolf Serkin, and his mother was the daughter of Adolf Busch), it couldn’t have been easy to make his own way.

    Yet he proved himself early, both as a graduate of the Curtis Institute of Music and as a brilliant participant in the Marlboro Music Festival. I recently broadcast a jaw-dropping recording he made at age of 16 of Busoni’s “Fantasia contrappuntistica.” By then, he had already been performing in public for four years. At 19, he was recognized with a special Grammy Award.

    But it was the ‘60s, so Serkin decided he didn’t want to play anymore. He dropped out, traveled to India, and moved to Mexico. He always did follow his own path. It was when he overheard music of Bach being played on a neighbor’s radio, one Sunday morning, that he finally came to grips with who he was.

    When he returned to the concert stage, not only could he play Bach and Beethoven with the best of them, he also pushed deep into contemporary territory. He was a champion of the works of Stefan Wolpe, and Toru Takemitsu, Charles Wuorinen, and Peter Lieberson all wrote pieces for him. He also became one of the founders of the new music ensemble Tashi.

    Over a career that spanned six decades, Serkin didn’t just emerge from the shadows of his father and grandfather, he established himself as a formidable artist in his own right, one with a distinctive and inimitable profile.

    R.I.P. Peter Serkin. To me, you’ll always be the Easy Rider of classical pianists.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/01/arts/music/peter-serkin-dead.html


    Serkins fils and père play Schubert:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlD9haP7g0g

    Serkin, 16, and Richard Goode, 20, play Busoni:

    Serkin plays Leon Kirchner:

    Tashi, from Messiaen’s “Quartet for the End of Time”:

    Serkin plays the “Goldberg Variations”:

  • Philly Orchestra Farrenc Shines Beyond Beethoven

    Philly Orchestra Farrenc Shines Beyond Beethoven

    Very interesting program at The Philadelphia Orchestra this weekend. Naturally, all promotions emphasize Trifanov and Beethoven (after all, they want to get butts in the seats), but I would like to shower the entire organization with rose petals for allowing the bulk of the concert to be devoted to music by Lili Boulanger and especially Louise Farrenc.

    If you’re unfamiliar with Farrenc, she was the only female professor at the Paris Conservatory in all of the 19th century. I have a preference for her Third Symphony, myself, but it was so good to be able to hear the Second performed live. It doesn’t always have to be Berlioz (her exact contemporary), for as much as I enjoy his music!

    Yannick, please check out Farrenc’s Symphony No. 3. And more adventurous programming, please! I understand the importance of new commissions for women composers, but there is still also plenty of worthwhile music by historical women that right now can only be experienced through recordings.

    The next time you have the urge to do Elgar, try your hand at Ethel Smyth. The overture to “The Wreckers” would make for a dynamic curtain-raiser. The “Serenade in D” is a symphony in all but name, with some pretty good tunes. If you prefer Czech, try Vítězslava Kaprálová. She inhabits a similar sound world to that of Martinu. And Poland’s Grazyna Bacewicz can stand toe-to-toe with just about any of the 20th century’s greatest composers.

    For the present, thank you, Philadelphia, for performing Boulanger and Farrenc. Now there are more, and perhaps even greater, treasures to be mined.

    As for the Beethoven concerto, of course the solo part held no terrors for Daniil Trifanov, the Rachmaninoff pianist du jour. But the orchestra also played with plenty of punch, under the muscular direction of Yannick Nézet-Séguin, and bubbled over with dynamism to the driving timpani of Angela Zator Nelson.

    The program is presented under the umbrella of the orchestra’s BeethovenNOW series. I’d be dismissive of the venture as a tired rehash of music that already gets raked over every year, all over the world, but if these musicians are energized by Beethoven the way they were on Thursday, then it will all probably be worth hearing, even by a jaded old bastard like myself. You can find more information at the orchestra’s website, philorch.org.

    PLEASE NOTE: For remaining performances of this particular program, tonight at 8 p.m. and tomorrow at 2 p.m., Trifanov will swap out Beethoven’s Piano Concerto No. 1 for the Piano Concerto No. 5, the popular “Emperor.”

    I am not able to access the review, since it’s paywalled, but if you already subscribe to the Philadelphia Inquirer, you can check out David Patrick Stearns’ impressions of the Thursday concert. From the headline, it looks as if he too was pleased to be able to hear Farrenc.

    https://www.inquirer.com/arts/philadelphia-orchestra-beethoven-now-daniil-trifonov-yannick-20200131.html

  • Prison Break Movie Soundtracks on Picture Perfect

    Prison Break Movie Soundtracks on Picture Perfect

    This week on “Picture Perfect, get yourself free. It’s an hour of music from movies about prison breaks.

    Indomitable Steve McQueen does hard time on Devil’s Island in “Papillon” (Jerry Goldsmith); Paul Newman sticks it to The Man in “Cool Hand Luke” (Lalo Schifrin); Tim Robbins makes good use of a Rita Hayworth poster in “The Shawshank Redemption” (Thomas Newman); and an all-star cast, led by a barbed-wire hopping McQueen, flee their Nazi captors in “The Great Escape” (Elmer Bernstein).

    Let’s face it, nobody looks good in orange. Grab a shank and a file. We’re bustin’ out of the joint, this Friday evening at 6:00 EST, on WWFM – The Classical Network and wwfm.org.

Tag Cloud

Aaron Copland (94) Beethoven (95) Composer (114) Film Music (152) Film Score (143) Film Scores (255) Halloween (107) John Williams (198) KWAX (233) Leonard Bernstein (105) Marlboro Music Festival (125) Movie Music (167) Mozart (91) Opera (222) Philadelphia Orchestra (91) Picture Perfect (174) Princeton Symphony Orchestra (110) Radio (90) Ross Amico (244) Roy's Tie-Dye Sci-Fi Corner (290) The Classical Network (101) The Lost Chord (269) Vaughan Williams (107) WPRB (397) WWFM (881)

DON’T MISS A BEAT

Receive a weekly digest every Sunday at noon by signing up here


RECENT POSTS